不同椎间融合方法对腰椎动态特性的影响

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.01.011

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 76-82.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.01.011

不同椎间融合方法对腰椎动态特性的影响

王庆东，郭立新，张驰，张东祥

)(东北大学机械工程与自动化学院，辽宁沈阳110819)

修回日期:2021-05-01 接受日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2022-01-25
通讯作者: 王庆东
作者简介:王庆东(1991-)，男，山东滨州人，东北大学博士研究生; 郭立新(1968-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，东北大学教授，博士生导师.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51875096，52005089); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N2103010).

Effects of Different Interbody Fusion Methods on Dynamic Characteristics of Lumbar Spines

WANG Qing-dong， GUO Li-xin， ZHANG Chi， ZHANG Dong-xiang

School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China.

Revised:2021-05-01 Accepted:2021-05-01 Published:2022-01-25
Contact: GUO Li-xin
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于有限元方法，研究比较了4种不同入路方法的腰椎椎体间融合方法(ALIF，PLIF，TLIF和DLIF)对全身振动状态下的腰椎融合节段及邻近节段的影响.引入了与并发症相关的重要指标，如应力分布、应力峰值及应力振幅等，并进行了比较分析.结果表明:在4种不同的方法中，ALIF可以为全身振动状态下的相邻节段提供一个更稳定的环境，并且该方法具有较好的抗振性能.与其他方法相比，DLIF可以降低振动状态下椎间融合器下沉及失效的风险.而且，DLIF可以为全身振动状态下的椎骨细胞提供一个更稳定、更合适的生长环境，更有利于椎骨融合成功.

关键词: 前路腰椎椎间融合;后路腰椎椎间融合;经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合;直接外侧腰椎椎体间融合;全身振动

Abstract: Based on the finite element method， the effects of four different methods of lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF， PLIF， TLIF and DLIF) on the lumbar fusion segments and adjacent segments under the condition of whole-body vibration were compared. Some important indexes related to complications such as stress distribution， stress peak and stress amplitude were introduced and compared. The results showed that ALIF can provide a more stable environment for the adjacent segments in the whole-body vibration state among the four different methods， and this method has better anti-vibration performance. Compared with the other methods， DLIF can reduce the risk of cage subsidence and failure. Besides， DLIF can provide a more stable and suitable environment for the growth of vertebral cells in the state of whole-body vibration， which is more conducive to the success of vertebral fusion.

Key words: anterior lumbar interbody fusion(ALIF); posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF); trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF); direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion(DLIF); whole-body vibration

中图分类号:

王庆东，郭立新，张驰，张东祥. 不同椎间融合方法对腰椎动态特性的影响[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(1): 76-82.

WANG Qing-dong， GUO Li-xin， ZHANG Chi， ZHANG Dong-xiang. Effects of Different Interbody Fusion Methods on Dynamic Characteristics of Lumbar Spines[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2022, 43(1): 76-82.

参考文献

[1]Klara P M，Freidank S A，Rezaiamiri S.Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion techniques using ray threaded fusion cages and pedicle screw fixation systems［J］.Neurosurgery Quarterly，2003，13 (1):20-29.
[2]Udby P M，Bech-Azeddine R.Clinical outcome of stand-alone alif compared to posterior instrumentation for degenerative disc disease:a pilot study and a literature review［J］.Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery，2015，133:64-69.
[3]沈凯，谭祖健.几种常见腰椎融合术的比较［J］.中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2011，26(11):1054-1056.(Shen Kai，Tan Zu-jian.Comparison of several common lumbar fusion procedures［J］.Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury，2011，26(11):1054-1056.)
[4]Wade K R，Schollum M L，Robertson P A，et al.Vibration really does disrupt the disc—a microanatomical investigation［J］.Spine，2016，41 (15):1185-1198.
[5]Lings S，Leboeuf-Yde C.Whole-body vibration and low back pain:a systematic，critical review of the epidemiological literature 1992—1999［J］.International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health，2000，73(5):290-297.
[6]Rohlmann A，Hinz B，Blüthner R，et al.Loads on a spinal implant measured in vivo during whole-body vibration［J］.European Spine Journal，2010，19 (7):1129-1135.
[7]Xu M，Yang J，Lieberman I H，et al.Finite element method-based analysis for effect of vibration on healthy and scoliotic spines［EB/OL］.(2016-12-05)［2020-08-06］.https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2016-59679.
[8]Wang Q D，Guo L X.Comparison of dynamic response of three TLIF techniques on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration［J］.Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering，2021，24(3):308-319.
[9]Cheung K M C，Karppinen J，Chan D，et al.Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals［J］.Spine，2009，34(9):934-940.
[10]Kim A，Kiapour A，Kiapour A M，et al.Biomechanical analysis of various footprints of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion devices［J］.Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques，2014，27(4):E118-E127.
[11]Liu X L，Ma J，Park P，et al.Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation:a three-dimensional finite element study［J］.BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders， 2017，18(1):63.
[12]Patwardhan A G，Havey R M，Meade K P，et al.A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression［J］.Spine，1999，24(10):1003-1009.
[13]Dickerson D A，Sander E A，Nauman E A.Modeling the mechanical consequences of vibratory loading in the vertebral body:microscale effects［J］.Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology，2008，7(3):191-202.
[14]Shirazi-Adl A，Parnianpour M.Role of posture in mechanics of the lumbar spine in compression［J］. Journal of Spinal Disorders，1996，9(4):277-286.
[15]李武杰，郭立新.不同姿势对脊椎胸腰节段爆裂骨折的影响［J］.东北大学学报(自然科学版)，2020，41(4):534-540.(Li Wu-jie，Guo Li-xin.Effect of different postures on burst fracture of thoracolumbar segment［J］.Journal of Northeastern University，2020，41(4):534-540.)
[16]Burstrm L，Nilsson T，Wahlstrm J.Whole-body vibration and the risk of low back pain and sciatica:a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health，2015，88(4):403-418.
[17]Wilder D G，Woodworth B B，Frymoyer J W，et al.Vibration and the human spine［J］.Spine，1982，7(3):243-254.
[18]Fan W，Guo L X.Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior，posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine［J］.Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering，2019，22(6):1-9.
[19]Xu H，Tang H，Guan X，et al.Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis［J］.Neurosurgery，2013，72(sup 1):21-26.
[20]Bylskiaustrow D I，Wall E J，Rupert M P，et al.Growth plate forces in the adolescent human knee:a radiographic and mechanical study of epiphyseal staples［J］.Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics，2001，21(6):817-823.
[21]Bylski-Austrow D I，Glos D L，Wall E J，et al.Scoliosis vertebral growth plate histomorphometry:comparisons to controls，growth rates，and compressive stresses［J］.Journal of Orthopaedic Research，2018，36(9):2450-2459.(上接第75页)
[7]Christian R.Device and method for applying a sealing profile:EP14192510.7 ［P］.2016-03-26.
[8]Sugizaki Y，Shiina T，Tanaka Y，et al.Effects of peel angle on peel force of adhesive tape from soft adherend［J］.Journal of Adhesion Science & Technology，2016，30(24):2637-2654.
[9]Dalbe M J，Cortet P P，Ciccotti M，et al.Multiscale stick-slip dynamics of adhesive tape peeling［J］.Physical Review Letters，2015，115(12):128301-1-128301-4.
[10]Mohammed I K，Charalambides M N，Kinloch A J .Modelling the interfacial peeling of pressure-sensitive adhesives［J］.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics，2015，222:141-150.
[11]Meng Z，He L.Study on registration algorithm of section profile of automobile sealing strip based on angle histogram［C］//2016 5th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Computer Science (ICAMCS 2016).Qingdao，2016:237-241.
[12]吴荣懿.汽车橡胶密封条静电植绒光照老化耐磨性能研究［J］.橡胶科技，2019，17(4):206-210.(Wu Rong-yi.Study on abrasion resistance of electrostatic flocking of automobile sealing strip after light aging ［J］.Rubber Science and Technology，2019，17(4):206-210.)

不同椎间融合方法对腰椎动态特性的影响

Effects of Different Interbody Fusion Methods on Dynamic Characteristics of Lumbar Spines

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价