环境规制距离对OFDI效率的影响

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2023.08.018

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 1201-1207.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2023.08.018

环境规制距离对OFDI效率的影响

张亚男¹，宁烨¹，庄梓鋆¹，张贺²

(1.东北大学工商管理学院，辽宁沈阳110169; 2.哈尔滨商业大学经济学院，黑龙江哈尔滨150028)

发布日期:2023-08-15
通讯作者: 张亚男
作者简介:张亚男(1995-)，女，黑龙江嫩江人，东北大学硕士研究生.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72072028).

Impact of Environmental Regulation Distance on the Efficiency of OFDI

ZHANG Ya-nan¹， NING Ye¹， ZHUANG Zi-yun¹， ZHANG He²

1. School of Business Administration， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110169， China; 2. School of Economics， Harbin University of Commerce， Harbin 150028， China.

Published:2023-08-15
Contact: ZHUANG Zi-yun
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于随机前沿引力模型，探讨环境规制距离与对外直接投资(OFDI)效率的关系以及双边经济关系的调节效应，并进行技术效率分析.研究结果表明，环境规制距离与OFDI效率呈负相关关系，高环境规制国家依据成本效应向低环境规制国家投资，低环境规制国家依据创新效应向高环境规制国家投资.当双边经济关系较好时，两国环境规制距离越大，OFDI效率越低.同时发现，中国在不同国家及区域投资效率具有异质性，并与区位选择相互影响.其中，在发展中国家、欠发达地区以及部分发达国家的投资效率较高;在亚洲与非洲的投资效率较高，而在欧洲的投资效率较低.基于此，本文最后提出缩小环境规制距离、提高OFDI效率以及合理进行投资区位选择等政策建议.

关键词: 环境规制距离;OFDI效率;双边经济关系;随机前沿引力模型;区域差异

Abstract: Based on the stochastic frontier gravity model， the impact of environmental regulation distance on the efficiency of OFDI and the moderating effect of bilateral economic relation as well as the technical efficiency were explored. The result showed that the regulation distance environmental is negatively associated with the efficiency of OFDI， investment flows from high-environment-regulated countries to low-environment-regulated countries based on cost effectiveness， and investment flows from low-environment-regulated countries to high-environment-regulated countries based on innovation effect. When the bilateral economic relations are tight， the greater two countries environmental regulation distance， the lower efficiency of OFDI. Meanwhile， Chinas efficiency of OFDI in different countries and regions is heterogeneous， and it interacts with location selection. Investment efficiency is higher in the developing countries， less developed regions and some developed countries. Efficiency in Asia and Africa is relatively higher when compared to Europe. Therefore， suggestions are provided including reducing the distance of environmental regulation， improving the efficiency of Chinas OFDI， and selecting reasonable investment locations.

Key words: environmental regulation distance; efficiency of OFDI; bilateral economic relation; stochastic frontier gravity model; regional difference

中图分类号:

F270

张亚男，宁烨，庄梓鋆，张贺. 环境规制距离对OFDI效率的影响[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 44(8): 1201-1207.

ZHANG Ya-nan， NING Ye， ZHUANG Zi-yun， ZHANG He. Impact of Environmental Regulation Distance on the Efficiency of OFDI[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2023, 44(8): 1201-1207.

参考文献

[1]傅京燕，李丽莎.环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究［J］.管理世界，2010(10):87-98.(Fu Jing-yan，Li Li-sha.A case study on the environmental regulation，the factor endowment and the international competitiveness in industries［J］.Management World，2010(10):87-98.)
[2]Cai X，Lu Y，Wu M，et al.Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China［J］.Journal of Development Economics，2016，123:73-85.
[3]Walter I，Ugelow J L.Environmental policies in developing countries［J］.Journal of the Human Environment，1979，8(2):102-109.
[4]Porter M E，Linde C V D.Green and competitive:ending the statement［J］.Harvard Business Review，1995，73(5):120-134.
[5]Repkine A，Min D.Foreign-funded enterprises and pollution halo hypothesis:a spatial econometric analysis of thirty Chinese regions［J］.Sustainability，2020，12:5048.
[6]吴玉鸣.外商直接投资对环境规制的影响［J］.国际贸易问题，2006(4):111-116.(Wu Yu-ming.Does foreign direct investment have effect on environmental regulations?［J］.Journal of International Trade，2006(4):111-116.)
[7]Anderson C L，Kagan R A.Adversarial legalism and transaction costs:the industrial-flight hypothesis revisited［J］.International Review of Law & Economics，2000，20(1):1-19.
[8]Kim Y，Rhee D E.Do stringent environmental regulations attract foreign direct investment in developing countries? evidence on the“race to the top”from cross-country panel data［J］.Emerging Markets Finance and Trade，2019，55(12):2796-2808.
[9]Grether J M，de Melo J.Globalization and dirty industries:do pollution havens matter? ［D］.Cambridge:CEPR Discussion Papers，2003.
[10]慕绣如.环境规制与FDI的非线性关系研究［J］.现代管理科学，2016(3):70-72.(Mu Xiu-ru.Research on the nonlinear relationship between environmental regulation and FDI［J］.Modern Management Science，2016(3):70-72.)
[11]Williamson J C.The room-bust cycle:stabilizing capital flows to emerging markets［J］.Institute for International Economies，2005(11):29-43.
[12]Xu D，Pan Y，Beamish P W.The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies［J］.Management International Review，2004，44(3):285-307.
[13]Dechezleprêtre A，Neumayer E，Perkins R.Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology:evidence from automobile patents［J］.Research Policy，2015，44(1):244-257.
[14]刘晓光，杨连星.双边政治关系、东道国制度环境与对外直接投资［J］.金融研究，2016(12):21-35.(Liu Xiao-guang，Yang Lian-xing.Bilateral political relation，host country institutional environment and outward foreign direct investment［J］.Journal of Financial Research，2016(12):21-35.)
[15]Kheder S B，Zugravu N.Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad:an economic geography model in an international comparative study［J］.Ecological Economics，2012，77(3):48-61.
[16]季凯文，周吉.“一带一路”建设下我国对外直接投资效率及其影响因素——基于随机前沿引力模型［J］.经济与管理评论，2018，34(4):138-148.(Ji Kai-wen，Zhou Ji.The efficiency and influencing factors of Chinese outward foreign direct investment along “the belt and road”—based on SFA gravity model［J］.Review of Economy and Management，2018，34(4):138-148.)
[17]Liu L Y，Zhao Z Z.The effects of environmental regulation on outward foreign direct investment’s reverse green technology spillover:crowding out or facilitation?［J］.Journal of Cleaner Production，2021，284:124689.
[18]宋林，谢伟，郑雯.“一带一路”战略背景下我国对外直接投资的效率研究［J］.西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)，2017，37(4):45-54.(Song Lin，Xie Wei，Zheng Wen.Research on the efficiency of Chinas outward foreign direct investment under the background of “the belt and road initiative”［J］.Journal of Xian Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)，2017，37(4):45-54.)

环境规制距离对OFDI效率的影响

Impact of Environmental Regulation Distance on the Efficiency of OFDI

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李丽君，衣峻林，程富. 统一授信模式下基于道德风险的收益分配模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(6): 896-901.
[2]	李丽君，刘杰，袁知柱. 集成供应链下财务困境的传递及控制决策模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 37(1): 148-152.
[3]	李慢，马钦海，赵晓煜，龙新宇. 服务场景中社会线索对顾客场所依恋的影响[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(4): 600-603.
[4]	杜晓君，朱园园. 制度距离、信息不对称和国际并购绩效——基于中国上市公司并购案的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(10): 1504-1507.
[5]	孙新波，谢远锐，钱雨. 知识联盟中激励协同有效性评价[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(10): 1508-1511.
[6]	高振明，庄新田，曹晓玲. 后股权分置时代并购目标公司的特征——基于中国上市公司的经验数据[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 34(6): 905-908.