东北大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 543-546.DOI: -

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

刚塑性有限元求解板带轧制过程的初速度场

梅瑞斌;李长生;刘相华;张光亮;   

  1. 东北大学轧制技术及连轧自动化国家重点实验室;中国科学院金属研究所;
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-22 修回日期:2013-06-22 出版日期:2009-04-15 发布日期:2013-06-22
  • 通讯作者: Li, C.-S.
  • 作者简介:-
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(50534020)

Initial velocity field for solution to strip rolling process by rigid plastic FEM

Mei, Rui-Bin (1); Li, Chang-Sheng (1); Liu, Xiang-Hua (1); Zhang, Guang-Liang (2)   

  1. (1) State Key Laboratory of Rolling and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China; (2) Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2013-06-22 Revised:2013-06-22 Online:2009-04-15 Published:2013-06-22
  • Contact: Li, C.-S.
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 用可压缩刚塑性有限元法,通过自行开发的计算程序对板带轧制过程进行了二维非线性求解.在保证计算精度的情况下,以缩短计算时间为目标,研究了初等方法、G函数法和改进细化网格法设定初速度场对计算时间和计算结果的影响.结果表明:轧制力计算结果和实测值吻合良好,满足精度要求;初等方法、G函数法和改进细化网格法的计算结果相对误差不超过3%,初速度场设定对轧制力求解影响较小;G函数法和改进细化网格法相对初等方法迭代步数较少,由于需要求解方程组,G函数法设定初速度场计算时间最长;改进细化网格法在保证计算精度情况下,减少了迭代步数,缩短了计算时间,提高了计算效率和求解稳定性.

关键词: 刚塑性有限元, 板带轧制, 改进细化网格法, 初始速度场, 迭代步数, 计算时间

Abstract: The rolling force in strip rolling process was solved nonlinearly by the program we developed via the 2D compressible rigid plastic FEM. With the aim of keeping the calculation accuracy unchanged and shortening calculating time, the influence of initial velocity field on calculating time and calculated results were discussed, where the initial velocity field was set differently by the primary, G function or improved refined mesh methods. It was founded that the calculated values of rolling force conform well to the measured values and meet the required accuracy. The relative calculation error can be controlled within 3% by any of the three methods. The initial velocity field affects little the solution to rolling force. In comparison with the primary method, the iteration steps in the G function and improved refined mesh methods are fewer. Because solving the equation sets is necessary, the time required for calculating the initial velocity field set by G function method is the longest one. As to the initial velocity field set by the improved refined mesh method, the calculating time is shortened due to decreased iteration steps with calculation accuracy unchanged, thus improving the calculation efficiency and solution stability.

中图分类号: