基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2020.12.018

东北大学学报:自然科学版 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1788-1793.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2020.12.018

基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价

王馨，陈妮，赵雅雯

(大连海事大学航运经济与管理学院，辽宁大连116026)

收稿日期:2019-10-19 修回日期:2019-10-19 出版日期:2020-12-15 发布日期:2020-12-22
通讯作者: 王馨
作者简介:王馨(1972-)，女，辽宁鞍山人，大连海事大学副教授.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71503029).

Value Evaluation of Innovative Technical Talents in Enterprises Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS

WANG Xin， CHEN Ni， ZHAO Ya-wen

School of Maritime Economics and Management， Dalian Maritime University， Dalian 116026， China.

Received:2019-10-19 Revised:2019-10-19 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-22
Contact: WANG Xin
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 借鉴冰山模型对胜任力的分类，将企业创新型技术人才价值分为显性价值和隐性价值.显性价值包括创新知识、创新技能和创新成果；隐性价值包括创新品格、创新动机和创新潜力.基于文献研究和深度访谈结果，选取21个创新型技术人才价值评价指标，采用熵权法计算权重，运用TOPSIS法评价创新型技术人才价值，并通过MATLAB软件实现评价过程，建立企业创新型技术人才价值评价体系.结果表明，基于熵权的TOPSIS方法能够有效评估企业创新型技术人才的要素价值和综合价值，可以为企业创新型技术人才的选拔、培养和激励提供重要依据.

关键词: 创新型技术人才, 胜任力, 熵权法, TOPSIS法, 价值评价

Abstract: Using the iceberg model for reference to classify competence， the value of innovative technical talents is divided into explicit value and implicit value. The explicit value includes innovation knowledge， innovation skills and innovation achievements while the implicit value includes innovation character， innovation motivation and innovation potential. Based on the results of literature research and in-depth interviews， 21 evaluation indexes of innovative technical talents are selected， the weight of indexes is determined by the entropy weight method， and the value of innovative technical talents is evaluated by the TOPSIS method. The evaluation process is realized by MATLAB software， and the value evaluation system of innovative technical talents in enterprises is established. The results show that the TOPSIS method based on entropy weight can effectively evaluate the element value and comprehensive value of innovative technical talents in enterprises， and provide an important basis for the selection， training and stimulation of talents in enterprises.

Key words: innovative technical talents, competence, entropy weight method, TOPSIS method, value evaluation

中图分类号:

C936

王馨，陈妮，赵雅雯. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(12): 1788-1793.

WANG Xin， CHEN Ni， ZHAO Ya-wen. Value Evaluation of Innovative Technical Talents in Enterprises Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2020, 41(12): 1788-1793.

参考文献

[1]Francis J，Collins D C.The impact of firms’ export orientation on the export performance of high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises［J］.Journal of International Marketing，2000，8(3):84-103.
[2]Snihur Y，Wiklund J.Searching for innovation: product，process，and business model innovations and search behavior in established firms［J］.Long Range Planning，2019，52(3):305-325.
[3]Zeng Z.Model for evaluating the technological innovation capability in high-tech enterprises with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information［J］.Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems，2017，33(4):2085-2094.
[4]Yang J.Research on the innovation method of continuing education model for professional technical personnel in manufacturing industry［J］.Educational Sciences—Theory & Practice，2018，18(5):2325-2331.
[5]萧鸣政，陈新明.中国人才评价制度发展70年分析［J］.行政论坛，2019，26(4):22-27.(Xiao Ming-zheng，Chen Xin-ming.Analysis on the development of talent evaluation system in China in the past 70 years［J］.Administrative Tribune，2019，26(4):22-27.)
[6]李瑞，吴孟珊，吴殿廷.工程技术类高层次创新型科技人才评价指标体系研究［J］.科技管理研究，2017，37(18):57-62.(Li Rui，Wu Meng-shan，Wu Dian-ting.Evaluation index system of high-level innovative talents in engineering technology［J］.Science and Technology Management Research，2017，37(18):57-62.)
[7]McClelland D C.Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”［J］.The American Psychologist，1973，28(1):1-14.
[8]McClelland D C.Identifying competencies with behavioral event interviews［J］.Psychological Science，1998，9(5):331-339.
[9]赵伟，林芬芬，彭洁，等.创新型科技人才评价理论模型的构建［J］.科技管理研究，2012，32(24):131-135.(Zhao Wei，Lin Fen-fen，Peng Jie，et al.Construction of evaluation theoretical model of innovative scientific and technological talents［J］.Science and Technology Management Research，2012，32 (24):131-135.)
[10]郭海玲，张雄涛，史海燕.基于冰山模型的县域电子商务人才评价研究［J］.数学的实践与认识，2019，49(17):273-280.(Guo Hai-ling，Zhang Xiong-tao，Shi Hai-yan.Research on county e-commerce talent evaluation based on iceberg model［J］.Practice and Understanding of Mathematics，2019，49 (17):273-280.)
[11]Polanyi M.Personal knowledge［M］.Chicago:Chicago University Press，1958:13-51.
[12]伍度志，杨帆，赵静，等.基于信息熵的加权基因关联网络融合方法［J］.电子科技大学学报，2018，47(2):286-291.(Wu Du-zhi，Yang Fan，Zhao Jing，et al.Integration of weighted gene association networks based on information entropy［J］.Journal of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China，2018，47(2):286-291.)
[13]姜德义，彭辉华，赵丽君，等.熵权集对分析法在盐岩储气库稳定性评价中的应用［J］.东北大学学报(自然科学版)，2017，38(2):284-289.(Jiang De-yi，Peng Hui-hua，Zhao Li-jun，et al.Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight to the stability evaluation of salt rock gas storage［J］.Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)，2017，38(2):284-289.)

基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价

Value Evaluation of Innovative Technical Talents in Enterprises Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李占山，杨云凯，张家晨. 基于熵权法的过滤式特征选择算法[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(7): 921-929.
[2]	王述红，朱宝强，张泽. 基于改进理想点模型的岩体结构面分级方法[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(1): 117-123.
[3]	张志峰，白焱. 基于综合赋权C-TOPSIS法的航天器研制风险控制[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 36(5): 626-630.
[4]	张义民，贾敬存，黄贤振. 基于数控机床故障信息的可靠性模糊分配[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 36(2): 245-249.
[5]	张兰霞;王俊;王雪;赵晋鹏;. 东北老工业基地国有企业高层管理者胜任力模型[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 28(4): 600-604.
[6]	张兰霞;张燕;王俊;. 知识型员工胜任力的评价指标与方法[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 27(8): 941-944.
[7]	张兰霞;王俊;刘杰. 人力资源经理胜任力的主客观评价方法[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(11): 102-105.