东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 102-106.DOI: -

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

语言层次观从索绪尔到韩礼德

徐来娟1,2   

  1. (1.西南大学外国语学院，重庆400715;2.扬州大学外国语学院，江苏扬州225009)
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-28 修回日期:2013-05-28 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 徐来娟
  • 作者简介:徐来娟(1975-)，女，江苏大丰人，西南大学博士研究生，扬州大学讲师，主要从事功能语言学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWU1209437)。

Theories of Linguistic Stratification From Saussure to Halliday

XU Laijuan1,2   

  1. (1. College of International Studies， Southwest University， Chongqing 400715， China; 2. School of Foreign Languages， Yangzhou University， Yangzhou 225009， China)
  • Received:2013-05-28 Revised:2013-05-28 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-12-30
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

567

摘要： 语言符号的层次性是现代语言学的核心理论之一。虽然现代语言学的创始人索绪尔没有直接提出层次性的概念，但他关于能指与所指的二元对立、形式与实体的二元对立、语言符号的任意性，以及能指的线性原则等思想为叶姆斯列夫、兰姆和韩礼德等人的层次理论提供了共同的理论背景。在对这三位学者有关层次的分类、层次的内容以及层次间和层次内部关系的描述进行梳理的基础上，探索并评介语言层次理论在他们之间的传承模式和发展概况，有助于更好地理解语言符号的本质。

关键词: 语言层次观, 索绪尔, 叶姆斯列夫, 兰姆, 韩礼德

Abstract: The stratificational nature of language as sign is a core concern of modern linguistics. Although Saussure himself did not study the stratificational nature of linguistic sign， his philosophical understanding of the two binary opposites—signifier vs. signified， form vs. substance， arbitrariness of the sign and linear character of the signal， provides a common theoretical background for Hjelmslev， Lamb and Halliday to develop their stratificational theories. Based on a careful comparison and contrast of how the strata are classified， what each stratum consists of and what the relationships among and within the strata are， this paper describes and comments on the background and development of the three linguists stratificational theories in order to have a better understanding of the properties of linguistic sign.

Key words: theory of linguistic stratification, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lamb, Halliday

中图分类号: