东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 195-201.DOI: -

• 马克思主义理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论哈贝马斯、霍耐特对马克思劳动观的新诠释

刘光斌   

  1. (湖南大学马克思主义学院,湖南长沙410082)
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-28 修回日期:2013-04-28 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 刘光斌
  • 作者简介:刘光斌(1978-),男,湖南洞口人,湖南大学讲师,哲学博士,主要从事西方马克思主义与法兰克福学派理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省社会科学基金资助项目(11YBB079);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(11YJC720025);湖南大学青年教师成长计划资助项目。

On Habermas and Honneth New Interpretations of Marxs Theory of Labor

LIU Guangbin   

  1. (School of Marxism, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)
  • Received:2013-04-28 Revised:2013-04-28 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-04-17
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 马克思提出了一种理解劳动观的生产范式,他通过对异化劳动和商品拜物教的批判,揭示出劳动概念包含着规范内涵。哈贝马斯采用了一种交往范式,通过区分劳动与相互作用,以相互作用取代劳动来解释规范内涵;霍耐特在承认理论中指出劳动包含着规范内涵,但必须依靠主体间为争取承认而斗争。从生产范式到交往范式、承认范式的演变表明哈贝马斯、霍耐特对马克思劳动观作出了新的诠释,反映出他们对资本主义现状的理性反思,但他们对马克思劳动观规范性内涵的片面诠释,值得我们去反思。

关键词: 马克思, 哈贝马斯, 霍耐特, 劳动观

Abstract: Karl Marx put forward a production paradigm to understand the concept of labor, and revealed the liberated normative connotation of labor by criticizing the theory of alienated labor and commodity fetishism. By means of a communicative paradigm, Habermas applied interaction instead of labor to explain the liberated normative connotation by distinguishing labor from interaction. In his recognition theory, Honneth pointed out that labor contains the liberated normative connotation, which should rely on the intersubjective struggle for recognition. Evolving from the production paradigm to the communicative paradigm and to the recognition paradigm, Habermas and Honneth offered new interpretations of Marxs theory of labor, which reflect their rational thinking of the status quo of capitalism. However, their onesided interpretations of the normative connotation deserve a careful reflection.

Key words: Karl Marx, Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth, theory of labor

中图分类号: