Research on the Failure of Policy Transfer in Chinese Government Governance——An Analysis of Policy Transfer Based on “Circuit Breaker”

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.03.009

Abstract

Abstract: The existing studies on the transfer of public policy have paid too much attention to the concept and causes of policy transfer but ignored the analysis of its process and effectiveness. The paper refers to some viewpoints and research ideas of the Dolowitz-Marsh model to create a new localization analysis framework， which includes the beginning of transfer， the object of transfer， the sources of transfer and the effectiveness of transfer. Taking the failure of the “circuit breaker” as a typical case， the paper， based on the analysis of collected data using the method of combining inductive data coding and typical content analysis coding， finds out that the reasons for the failure of the “circuit breaker” include insufficient scientific design of the system， weak regulatory supervision， and the separation of policy introduction from China's national conditions， and provides more clear guiding significance for the current national policy transfer practice by drawing the enlightenment of policy transfer in government governance.

Key words: policy transfer, Dolowitz-Marsh model, circuit breaker, transfer failure

CLC Number:

D035

ZHENG Mei-ling， WEI Shu-yan. Research on the Failure of Policy Transfer in Chinese Government Governance——An Analysis of Policy Transfer Based on “Circuit Breaker”[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(3): 283-290.

References

[1]Newmark A J. An Integrated Approach to Policy Transfer and Diffusion［J］. Review of Policy Research， 2010，19(2):151-178.
[2]Bennett C J. What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?［J］. British Journal of Political Science， 1991，21(2):215-233.
[3]Howlett M. Beyond Legalism? Policy Ideas， Implementation Styles and Emulation-based Convergence in Canadian and U.S. Environmental Policy［J］. Journal of Public Policy， 2000，20(3):305-329.
[4]May P J. Policy Learning and Failure［J］. Journal of Public Policy， 1992，12(4):331-354.
[5]Dolowitz D，Marsh D. Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature［J］. Political Studies， 2010，44(2):344.
[6]Dolowitz D，Marsh D. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-making［J］. Governance， 2000，13(1):5-23.
[7]Evans M，Davies J. Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-level， Multi-disciplinary Perspective［J］. Public Administration， 2010，77(2):361-385.
[8]Wolman H，Page E. Policy Transfer Among Local Governments: An Information-theory Approach［J］. Governance， 2002，15(4):478.
[9]熊烨，周建国. 政策转移中的政策再生产:影响因素与模式概化——基于江苏省“河长制”的QCA分析［J］. 甘肃行政学院学报， 2017(1):37-47.
[10]Stone D. Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy Across Time， Space and Disciplines［J］. Politics， 2010，19(1):51-59.
[11]Rose R. Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space［J］. American Political Science Review， 1995，89(1):176-236.
[12]陈芳. 政策扩散、政策转移和政策趋同——基于概念、类型与发生机制的比较［J］. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)， 2013(6):8-16.
[13]魏淑艳. 转型时期中国公共政策转移的发生机理、结构变量与历史逻辑［J］. 上海行政学院学报， 2014，15(1):59-69.
[14]刘雪明，钟莉. 公共政策有效转移的促进策略［J］. 行政论坛， 2011，18(2):54-57.
[15]张克. 政策扩散视角下的省直管县财政改革——基于20个省份数据的探索性分析［J］. 北京行政学院学报， 2017(1):17-26.
[16]朱多刚，胡振吉. 中央政府推进政策扩散的方式研究——以廉租房政策为例［J］. 东北大学学报(社会科学版)， 2017，19(4):378-384.
[17]程瑨，冯锋，李庆. 国家自主创新示范区科技政策研究——基于科技人才政策转移视角［J］. 中国高校科技， 2017(9):74-76.
[18]刘慧，孙伦轩. 教育政策转移:形式、过程与动机［J］. 教育探索， 2016(11):120-123.
[19]贾洪文，李润平，刘达. 熔断机制的国内外比较——兼析中国熔断机制失灵的原因［J］. 西安财经学院学报， 2017，30(4):14-19.
[20]云乐鑫，杨俊，张玉利. 基于海归创业企业创新型商业模式原型的生成机制［J］. 管理学报， 2014(3):367-376.
[21]Elliot M. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative［M］. Cambridge: Harvard University Press， 1986.