Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 187-192.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.02.013

• Law • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Dilemma and Ways of Imputation Principles for Ecological Destruction Liability in the Newly Revised Environmental Protection Law

LI Yu1,2   

  1. (1. Law School, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; 2. Economics and Management School, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China)
  • Received:2015-06-12 Revised:2015-06-12 Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-06-12
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

Abstract: Article 64 of the newly revised Environmental Protection Law stipulates that Tort Liability Law should be applied to ecological destruction liability but the imputation principles for ecological destruction liability are not explicitly stated. Whether ecological destruction liability applies to the principle for rigid liability or the principle for fault liability, or both, is still in the debate among the academic researchers. Due to the lack of a clear basis for judicial practices, similar cases may end up with very different trials. It is argued that ecological destruction is hazardous, which conforms to the imputation principle for rigid liability. Therefore, a special law for environmental tort at an adequately effective legislative level should be laid down based on Article 2 and Article 7 of Tort Liability Law, and it should be clearly stated that ecological destruction should apply to the principle for rigid liability.

Key words: ecological destruction liability, rigid liability, fault liability

CLC Number: