基于云理论的斜拉索耐久性风险评估

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2019.03.023

东北大学学报:自然科学版 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 425-429.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2019.03.023

基于云理论的斜拉索耐久性风险评估

梁力¹，邢观华¹，吴凤元²

(1. 东北大学资源与土木工程学院，辽宁沈阳110819; 2. 沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院，辽宁沈阳 110168)

收稿日期:2017-12-29 修回日期:2017-12-29 出版日期:2019-03-15 发布日期:2019-03-08
通讯作者: 梁力
作者简介:梁力(1955-)，男，辽宁丹东人，东北大学教授，博士生导师.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51474048); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N110301001).

Durability Risk Assessment of Stay Cables Based on Cloud Theory

LIANG Li¹， XING Guan-hua¹， WU Feng-yuan²

1. School of Resources & Civil Engineering， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China; 2. School of Civil Engineering， Shenyang Jianzhu University， Shenyang 110168， China.

Received:2017-12-29 Revised:2017-12-29 Online:2019-03-15 Published:2019-03-08
Contact: XING Guan-hua
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了有效地避免事故的发生，给项目的安全提供前瞻性意见，提出一种基于云理论和ALARP准则的空间风险分析法.首先引入“可预兆性”作为风险指标，建立三维风险空间.随后定义了“风险界面”的概念，并以风险指标等级为变量建立界面方程.通过修改变量系数调整风险空间形态，实现不同评估需求下对风险指标的赋权.最后，根据云运算法则建立风险空间云模型和评估样本云模型，并基于样本云模型生成大量云滴，带入风险空间正向云发生器中计算平均确定度，作为确定最终风险评级的依据，实现了风险评估过程的完全量化.以斜拉索耐久性风险评估为例，验证了新方法与规范的相符性和可行性.

关键词: ALARP准则, 云理论, 风险评价, 斜拉索, 耐久性

Abstract: Reasonable evaluation of risk can effectively avoid accidents and provide forward-looking opinions for the project safety. A spatial risk analysis method based on cloud theory and ALARP criterion was proposed. First of all， "predictability" is introduced as a risk index to establish a three-dimensional risk space. Subsequently， the concept of "the risk interface" is defined， and the interface equation is established based on the level of the risk index. By modifying the variable coefficient， the risk space shape is adjusted to realize the empowerment of risk indicators under different assessment needs. Finally， the cloud models of risk space and evaluation sample are established according to the principle of cloud theory. Based on sample cloud model， a large number of cloud drops are generated and brought into normal cloud generator to calculate average certain degree， which is a basis for determining the final risk rating. It realizes the complete quantification of the risk assessment process. The consistency and feasibility between this method and standard are verified by taking durability risk evaluation as an example.

Key words: as low as reasonable practical (ALARP) criterion, cloud theory, risk evaluation, stay cables, durability

中图分类号:

TU43

梁力，邢观华，吴凤元. 基于云理论的斜拉索耐久性风险评估[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(3): 425-429.

LIANG Li， XING Guan-hua， WU Feng-yuan. Durability Risk Assessment of Stay Cables Based on Cloud Theory[J]. Journal of Northeastern University Natural Science, 2019, 40(3): 425-429.

参考文献

[1]Esksesn S D，Tengborg P，Kampmann J，et al.Guidelines for tunnelling risk management:international tunneling association，working group No.2 ［J］.Tunneling and Underground Space Technology，2004，19(3):217-237.
[2]Jones L M，Aven T.ALARP-what does it really mean［J］.Reliability Engineering & System Safety，2011，96(8):877-882.
[3]Bottelberghs P H.Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherland［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials，2000，71:59-84.
[4]Trbojevic V M.Risk criteria in EU［J］.Risk，2005，10(5):1945-1952.
[5]Soren D K，Per T B，Jorgen K M，et al.Guidelines for tunneling risk management:international tunneling association working group No.2［J］.Tunneling and Underground Space Technology，2004，19(1):217-237.
[6]Xu Z，Zhu P，Mei J.Research on backward cloud model with uncertainty［J］. Journal of Networks，2013，8(11):2556-2563.
[7]Wang G，Xu C，Li D.Generic normal cloud mode［J］.Information Science，2014，280(1):1-15.
[8]Dong W，Zeng D，Singh V P，et al.A cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment［J］.Environmental Research，2016(149):113-121.
[9]Yang J，Liu H，Yu X，et al.Entropy-cloud model of heavy metals pollution assessment in farmland soils of mining areas［J］.Polish Journal of Environmental Studies，2016，25(3):1315-1322.
[10]汪明武，李健，徐鹏，等.膨胀土与石灰改良膨胀土涨缩性的云模型评价［J］.东南大学学报(自然科学版)，2014，44(2):396-400.(Wang Ming-wu，Li Jian，Xu Peng，et al.Cloud model for shrinkage-swelling property classification of untreated and lime-treated expansive clays［J］.Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition)，2014，44(2):396-400.)
[11]黄侨，任远，马文刚.斜拉索病害及其养护维修［J］.预应力技术，2011(3):19-25.(Huang Qiao，Ren Yuan，Ma Wen-gang.Deterioration and maintenance of stayed-cables［J］.Prestress Technology，2011(3):19-25.)

基于云理论的斜拉索耐久性风险评估

Durability Risk Assessment of Stay Cables Based on Cloud Theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王馨，王婧，李金锋. 基于贝叶斯网络的企业社交网络招聘风险评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(9): 1356-1362.
[2]	伦培元，张小刚，张强，赵然. 基于初始缺陷形状的混凝土结构锈胀开裂理论模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(7): 1020-1026.
[3]	梁力，邢观华，吴凤元. 基于云理论的评估模型和方法[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(6): 881-885.
[4]	梁力，邢观华，任艺鹏，孙爽. 基于云理论的斜拉索可靠性评价方法[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(4): 585-589.
[5]	王述红，张泽，侯文帅，王斐笠. 综合管廊多灾种耦合致灾风险评价方法[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(6): 902-906.
[6]	郑一峰，李龙，房玮，高欣. 基于信息熵-未确知测度理论的公路桥梁耐久性评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(8): 1206-1211.
[7]	蒋卫东;陈啸;闫俊;刘斌;. 盐渍地区抗腐蚀混凝土耐久性试验研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 29(2): 280-283.
[8]	黄敏;李凤娥;王兴伟. 基于PERT的虚拟企业风险评价模型[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(9): 860-863.
[9]	郑双忠;陈宝智;吴穹;戴丽艳. 易燃易爆企业火灾危险性评价及对策[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 22(6): 668-670.