“政产学”协同对创业活跃度的影响——基于三螺旋视角的定性比较分析

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.017

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1640-1649.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.017

“政产学”协同对创业活跃度的影响——基于三螺旋视角的定性比较分析

贾建锋¹，刘伟鹏¹，张卫国²

(1. 东北大学工商管理学院，辽宁沈阳110169; 2. 山西财经大学公共管理学院，山西太原030006)

修回日期:2021-04-02 接受日期:2021-04-02 发布日期:2021-11-19
通讯作者: 贾建锋
作者简介:贾建锋(1980-)，男，山西晋中人，东北大学教授，博士生导师；张卫国(1969-)，男，山西汾阳人，山西财经大学教授.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972032)；辽宁省兴辽英才计划项目(XLYC1807218)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N2006005)；辽宁省社科联2021年度辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题(20211s1ybkt-036).

Influence of “Government-Industry-University” Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix

JIA Jian-feng¹， LIU Wei-peng¹， ZHANG Wei-guo²

1. School of Business Administration， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110169， China; 2. School of Public Administration， Shanxi University of Finance and Economics， Taiyuan 030006， China.

Revised:2021-04-02 Accepted:2021-04-02 Published:2021-11-19
Contact: JIA Jian-feng
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨影响省份间创业活跃度差异的因果复杂机制，借鉴三螺旋理论，整合“政产学”3个层面的6个前因要素，应用组态思维和定性比较分析(QCA)方法进行分析.研究发现:单个“政产学”要素并不构成高创业活跃度的必要条件，各地区没有按照某一固定模式提升创业活跃度.高创业活跃度的驱动机制可以分为三条路径:“政学”协同主导型、“政产”协同主导型与“产学”协同主导型.现阶段没有任何一个地区的高创业活跃度是通过“政产学”三者完美协同提升的，仅限于其中两者间协同运转.

关键词: 创业活跃度;三螺旋;定性比较分析;政产学;协同创业

Abstract: To explore the complex causal mechanism that affects the differences in entrepreneurial activity among regions， based on the triple helix theory， the configuration thinking and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method are used to integrate six conditional variables at three levels of government-industry-university. Results found that: any single element of government-industry-university does not constitute a necessary condition for high entrepreneurial activity in regions， and regions have not increased entrepreneurial activity in accordance with a certain fixed pattern. The driving mechanism of high entrepreneurial activity can be divided into three paths: “government-university” coordination-driven path， “government-industry” coordination-driven path and “industry-university” coordination-driven path. At present， no region uses the perfect synergy of “government-industry-university” to achieve high entrepreneurial activity， and it is limited to the coordinated operation of the two.

Key words: entrepreneurial activity; triple helix; QCA(qualitative comparative analysis); government-industry-university; cooperation entrepreneurship

中图分类号:

C936

贾建锋，刘伟鹏，张卫国. “政产学”协同对创业活跃度的影响——基于三螺旋视角的定性比较分析[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(11): 1640-1649.

JIA Jian-feng， LIU Wei-peng， ZHANG Wei-guo. Influence of “Government-Industry-University” Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(11): 1640-1649.

参考文献

[1]赵涛，张智，梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据［J］.管理世界，2020，36(10):65-76.(Zhao Tao，Zhang Zhi，Liang Shang-kun.Digital economy，entrepreneurship，and high-quality economic development:Empirical evidence from urban China［J］.Management World，2020，36(10):65-76.)
[2]Carayannis E G，Campbell D F J.Triple helix，quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge，innovation and the environment relate to each other?a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology［J］.International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development，2010，1(1):41-69.
[3]Galán-Muros V，Plewa C.What drives and inhibits university business cooperation in Europe? a comprehensive assessement［J］.R & D Management，2016，46(2):369-382.
[4]Yu C W.Understanding the ecosystems of Chinese and American entrepreneurship education［J］.Journal of Entrepreneurship Education，2018，21(2):1-18.
[5]Pique J M，Berbegal-Mirabent J，Etzkowitz H.Triple helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation:the case of Silicon Valley［J］.Triple Helix，2018，5(1):1-21.
[6]Temple P.The capitalization of knowledge:a triple helix of university-industry-government ［J］.Leadership & Organization Development Journal，2010，9(3):142-144.
[7]Champenois C，Etzkowitz H.From boundary line to boundary space:the creation of hybrid organizations as a triple helix micro-foundation［J］.Technovation，2018，76:28-39.
[8]陈劲，张学文.中国创新驱动发展与科技体制改革(2012—2017)［J］.科学学研究，2018，36(12):2116-2121.(Chen Jing，Zhang Xue-wen.Innovation-driven development and scientific and technical structural reform(2012—2017)［J］.Scientific Research，2018，36(12):2116-2121.)
[9]Lim D S K，Oh C H，de Clercq D.Engagement in entrepreneurship in emerging economies:interactive effects of individual-level factors and institutional conditions［J］.International Business Review，2016，25(4):933-945.
[10]Shane S，Venkataraman S.The promise ofentrepreneurship as a field of research［J］.Academy of Management Review，2000，25(1):217-226.
[11]Ragin C C.Fuzzy-set social science［M］.Chicago:University of Chicago Press，2000:1-370.
[12]Fainshmidt S，Witt M A，Aguilera R V，et al.The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)to international business research［J］.Journal of International Business Studies，2020，51:455-466.
[13]Nola H D，Stephen R.Output additionality of public support for innovation:evidence for Irish manufacturing plants［J］.European Planning Studies，2010，18(1):107-122.
[14]Mazzei M J，Ketchen D J，Shook C L.Understanding strategic entrepreneurship:a “theoretical toolbox” approach［J］.International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal，2017，13(2):631-663.
[15]Audretsch D B，Belitski M.Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities:establishing the framework conditions［J］.The Journal of Technology Transfer，2017，42(5):1030-1051.
[16]Goethner M，Obschonka M，Silbereisen R K，et al.Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship:economic and psychological determinants［J］. Journal of Economic Psychology，2012，33(3):628-641.
[17]项国鹏，潘凯凌，张文满.网络关系、创业机会识别与创业决策——基于浙江新创企业的实证研究［J］.科技管理研究，2018，38(22):169-177.(Xiang Guo-peng，Pan Kai-ling，Zhang Wen-man.Network relation，entrepreneurial opportunity recognition and entrepreneurial decision-making:based on new ventures in Zhejiang Province［J］.Science and Technology Management Research，2018，38(22):169-177.)
[18]何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式［J］.科学学研究，2012，30(2):165-174.(He Yu-bing.The theoretical model of I-U-R collaborative innovation［J］.Scientific Research，2012，30(2):165-174.)
[19]Leydesdorff L.The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems［J］.Journal of Contemporary Sociology，2005，42(1):12-27.
[20]陈延良，李德丽.三螺旋理论视角下的政产学协同育人实践与模式构建［J］.黑龙江高教研究，2018(8):87-90.(Chen Yan-liang，Li De-li.Practice and model construction of collaborative education by government，industry and higher education institutions from perspective of triple helix theory［J］.Higher Education Research in Heilongjiang Province，2018(8):87-90.)
[21]Lai W H，Lin C C.Constructing business incubation service capabilities for tenants at post-entrepreneurial phase［J］.Journal of Business Research，2015，68(11):2285-2289.
[22]Marino M，Lhuillery S，Parrotta P，et al.Additionality or crowding-out? an overall evaluation of public R & D subsidy on private R & D expenditure［J］.Research Policy，2016，45(9):1715-1730.
[23]Levchenko A A.International trade and institutional change［J］.The Journal of Law，Economics & Organization，2013，29(5):1145-1181.
[24]Elitzur R，Gavious A.Selection of entrepreneurs in the venture capital industry:an asymptotic analysis［J］.European Journal of Operational Research，2011，215(3):705-712.
[25]Etzkowitz H，Leydesdorff L.The dynamics of innovation:from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations［J］.Research Policy，2000，29(2):109-123.
[26]Pittino D，Martínez A B，Chirico F，et al.Psychological ownership，knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms:the moderating role of governance heterogeneity［J］.Journal of Business Research，2018，84:312-326.
[27]KruegerJr N F，Reilly M D，Carsrud A L.Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions［J］.Journal of Business Venturing，2000，15(5/6):411-432.(上接第1639页)

“政产学”协同对创业活跃度的影响——基于三螺旋视角的定性比较分析

Influence of “Government-Industry-University” Cooperation on Entrepreneurial Activity:Qualitative Comparative Analysis from the Perspective of Triple Helix

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王馨，陈妮，赵雅雯. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的企业创新型技术人才价值评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(12): 1788-1793.
[2]	王馨，王婧，李金锋. 基于贝叶斯网络的企业社交网络招聘风险评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(9): 1356-1362.