东北大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 289-296.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.02.019

• 管理科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国省级生态福利绩效的测度及其影响因素

张彦博, 李想, 刘伟, 寇坡   

  1. (东北大学 工商管理学院, 辽宁 沈阳110169)
  • 修回日期:2021-04-10 接受日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2022-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 张彦博
  • 作者简介:张彦博(1969-),女,辽宁辽阳人,东北大学副教授.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72171040); 国家社会科学基金资助项目(15ZDC034).

Measurement of China’s Provincial Ecological Welfare Performance and Its Influencing Factors

ZHANG Yan-bo, LI Xiang, LIU Wei, KOU Po   

  1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China.
  • Revised:2021-04-10 Accepted:2021-04-10 Published:2022-02-28
  • Contact: ZHANG Yan-bo
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 基于定义法构建生态福利绩效测度模型,在此基础上采用2007—2017年我国30个省、市、自治区的面板数据测算生态福利绩效水平,并对决定其差异的影响因素进行实证分析.研究发现:我国生态福利绩效在时间趋势上经历了“上升—下降—上升”三个阶段,整体以19.3%的幅度上升.区域特征上则呈现出“东部最高,西部次之,中部最低”的地域格局.经济规模促进了我国生态福利绩效水平的提高,而政府监管、城镇化、产业结构对生态福利绩效产生负面影响;形式主义和信息不对称使得公众参与无法对生态福利绩效产生有效影响.

关键词: 人类发展指数;生态消耗指数;生态福利绩效;政府监管;公众参与

Abstract: An ecological welfare performance model is constructed based on its definition. On this basis, the panel data of 30 provinces, cities and autonomous regions in China from 2007 to 2017 are used to measure the ecological welfare performance level, and the influencing factors that determine its differences are empirically analyzed. It is found that China’s ecological welfare performance has experienced three stages of “rising-falling-rising” in the time trend, and the overall increase is 19.3%. In terms of regional characteristics, ecological welfare performance presents a pattern of “the highest in the east, the second in the west, and the lowest in the middle”. Economic scale has improved China’s ecological welfare performance, while government supervision, urbanization and industrial structure are the negative factors that inhibit the improvement of China’s ecological welfare performance. Formalism and information asymmetry make it impossible for public participation to have an impact on the ecological welfare performance.

Key words: human development index; ecological consumption index; ecological welfare performance; government supervision; public participation

中图分类号: