视觉搜索中图标布局的影响机理

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.009

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1579-1584.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2021.11.009

视觉搜索中图标布局的影响机理

金涛¹，明成业¹，周淑芳²，何家敏¹

(1. 中国石油大学(华东) 机电工程学院，山东青岛266580; 2. 青岛黄海学院智能制造学院，山东青岛266427)

修回日期:2021-04-28 接受日期:2021-04-28 发布日期:2021-11-19
通讯作者: 金涛
作者简介:金涛(1980-)，男，山东青岛人，中国石油大学(华东)副教授，硕士生导师.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52075547).

Impact Mechanism of Icon Layout on Visual Search Performance

JIN Tao¹， MING Cheng-ye¹， ZHOU Shu-fang²， HE Jia-min¹

1.College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering， China University of Petroleum， Qingdao 266580， China; 2. School of Intelligence and Manufacture， Qingdao Huanghai University， Qingdao 266427， China.

Revised:2021-04-28 Accepted:2021-04-28 Published:2021-11-19
Contact: JIN Tao
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用视觉搜索范式，研究图标视觉特征及数量变化对图标布局认知绩效的影响.实验表明，当图标数量N=6时，仅图标视觉特征主效应显著，布局方式对搜索速度无显著影响，图标视觉特征是认知绩效的主要影响因素;当图标数量N=15时，仅图标布局方式主效应显著，横向排列搜索速度最快.通过图标数量的连续性变化实验发现，图标数量超过10个，横向排列反应时显著低于纵向排列，两者错误率无显著差异;随着图形面板 L_○长度 / S_○宽度比值的降低，两者平均反应时差距逐渐缩小，趋于一致.研究表明，图标数量的变化对布局方式和视觉特征的认知绩效产生显著影响.

关键词: 图标布局;视觉特征;图标数量;认知绩效

Abstract: The classic search paradigm was used to study the impact of icon visual features and number changes on the cognitive performance of icon layout. Experiments showed when the number of icons was 6， only the main effect of icon visual features was significant， the icon layout had no significant effect on the search speed， and the icon visual features were the main influencing factor of cognitive performance; when the number of icons was 15， only the main effect of icon layout was significant， and the search speed of horizontal arrangement was the fastest. When the number of icons was more than 10， the reaction time of horizontal arrangement was significantly lower than that of vertical arrangement， and there was no significant difference in the error rate between them; with the decrease of L_{○ 长度}/S_宽度 ratio of graphic panel， the average reaction time difference between the two was gradually reduced and tended to be the same. Research showed that the number of icons has a significant impact on the cognitive performance of icon layout and visual features.

Key words: icon layout; visual feature; icon number; cognitive performance

中图分类号:

TB472
B849

金涛，明成业，周淑芳，何家敏. 视觉搜索中图标布局的影响机理[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 42(11): 1579-1584.

JIN Tao， MING Cheng-ye， ZHOU Shu-fang， HE Jia-min. Impact Mechanism of Icon Layout on Visual Search Performance[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(11): 1579-1584.

参考文献

[1]Wolfe J M，Horowitz T S.Five factors that guide attention in visual search［J］.Nature Human Behaviour，2017，1(3):597-607.
[2]Durugbo C M.Eye tracking for work-related visual search:a cognitive task analysis［J］.Ergonomics，2021，2(64):225-240.
[3]Shen Z F，Zhang L H，Li R，et al.The effects of icon internal characteristics on complex cognition［J］.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，2020，79:121-146.
[4]Thorpe S，Fize D，Marlot C.Speed of processing in the human visual system［J］.Nature，1996，381(6582):520-525.
[5]刘青，薛澄岐，Falk Hoehn.基于眼动跟踪技术的界面可用性评估［J］.东南大学学报(自然科学版)，2010，40(2):331-334.(Liu Qing，Xue Cheng-qi，Falk Hoehn.Interface usability evaluation based on eye tracking technology［J］.Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition)，2010，40(2):331-334.)
[6]宫勇，杨颖，张三元，等.图形面板布局特征对人机交互效率的影响［J］.计算机辅助设计与图形学学报，2012，24(9)，1145-1150.(Gong Yong，Yang Ying，Zhang San-yuan，et al.The influence of graphic panel layout characteristics on the efficiency of human-computer interaction［J］.Journal of Computer Aided Design and Graphics，2012，24(9):1145-1150.)
[7]Vanderdonckt J，Bouzit S，Calvary G，et al.Exploring a design space of graphical adaptive menus:normal vs.small screens［J］.The ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems，2019，10(1):1-40.
[8]Chen C，Chiang S.The effects of panel arrangement on search performance［J］.Displays，2011，32(5):254-260.
[9]Simonin M.Effects of display layout on gaze activity during visual search［M］.Berlin:Heidelberg，2015:1-42.
[10]Shih H，Goonetilleke R.Effectiveness of menu orientation in Chinese［J］.Human Factors，1998，40(4):569-576.
[11]Ball F，Busch N.Change detection on a hunch:pre-attentive vision allows “sensing” of unique feature changes［J］.Atten Percept Psychophys，2015，77(8):2570-2588.
[12]Lin H，Hsieh Y，Wu F.A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users′ attention［J］.Computers in Human Behavior，2016，63:218-228.
[13]Mcgrath L，Bresciani S，Eppler M J.We walk the line:icons provisional appearances on virtual whiteboards trigger elaborative dialogue and creativity［J］.Computers in Human Behavior，2016，63:717-726.
[14]Lindberg T，Naesaenen R.The effect of icon spacing and size on the speed of icon processing in the human visual system［J］.Displays，2003，24(3):111-120.
[15]Fleetwood M D，Byrne M D.Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM［J］.Cognitive Systems Research，2018，3(1):25-33.
[16]Fleetwood M D，Byrne M D.Modeling the visual search of displays:a revised ACT-R model of icon search based on eye-tracking data［J］.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates，2009，21(2):153-197.
[17]Albert B，Tullis T.Measuring the user experience(interactive technologies):collecting，analyzing，and presenting usability metrics［M］.Netherlands:Morgan Kaufmann， 2013:654-658.
[18]Cheng Y C，Chen H J，Hung W H.The effect of different icon shape and width on touch behavior［C］// International Conference on Engineering Psychology & Cognitive Ergonomics.Cham:Springer，2020:32-44.
[19]Susana G，Gutiérrez J M，Herrera S，et al.Sensitivity analysis of driver′s behavior and psychophysical conditions［J］.Safety Science，2020，125:23-30.
[20]Guo F，Qu Q，Nagamachi M，et al.A proposal of the event-related potential method to effectively identify Kansei words for assessing product design features in kansei engineering research［J］.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，2020，76:358-362.
[21]Forster S，Lavie N.Attentional capture by entirely irrelevant distractors［J］.Visual Cognition，2008，16(2/3):200-214.
[22]Ales M.FIART:adaptive resonance model of feature integration，proto-objects formation and coherence theory of visual attention［J］.Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures，2017，21:13-25.
[23]Michalski R，Grobelny J，Karwowski W.The effects of graphical interface design characteristics on human-computer interaction task efficiency［J］.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics，2006，36(11):959-977.

视觉搜索中图标布局的影响机理

Impact Mechanism of Icon Layout on Visual Search Performance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	林秀丽，曹亚平，夏祉君，柳静献. 轴流旋风分离器特性的数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(9): 1360-1364.
[2]	王海英，李亚宁，周畅，王琳. 反义标识的认知实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(7): 1056-1060.
[3]	胡名彩，郭伏，叶国全. 基于改进变精度贝叶斯粗糙集的感性知识获取[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(12): 1794-1799.
[4]	花福安，侯帅，李建平. 锌液倒角对垂直电磁封流过程中电磁力的影响[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(6): 808-812.
[5]	林秀丽，曹亚平，董思敬，柳静献. 机车用折角式过滤器特性的数值模拟[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 39(3): 436-440.
[6]	金海哲，陈瀚，周玉林，刘玮琳. 基于顾客偏好的瓶装水外观感性质量评价[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 38(2): 295-299.
[7]	操雅琴，郭伏，屈庆星. 基于多模式测量的网站用户行为意图预测模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(11): 1669-1672.
[8]	牛东方，谢里阳，杨松，吕春梅. 基于特征分析的机电产品交互界面评价模型[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(6): 846-849.
[9]	郭伏，于聪，丁一. 网页交互任务的用户情感测量方法[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(1): 131-134.