砂带表面形貌测量与评价研究

doi:10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.09.009

东北大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1277-1282.DOI: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.09.009

砂带表面形貌测量与评价研究

张伟健¹，巩亚东¹，赵旭²，赵显力¹

(1. 东北大学机械工程与自动化学院，辽宁沈阳110819； 2. 辽宁科技大学机械工程与自动化学院，辽宁鞍山114051)

发布日期:2022-09-16
通讯作者: 张伟健
作者简介:张伟健(1993 -)，男，辽宁大连人，东北大学博士研究生；巩亚东(1958-)，男，辽宁本溪人，东北大学教授，博士生导师.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1908230)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N2203005，N2203015).

Investigation on the Measurement and Evaluation of Abrasive Belt Surface Morphology

ZHANG Wei-jian¹， GONG Ya-dong¹， ZHAO Xu²， ZHAO Xian-li¹

1. School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China; 2. School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation， University of Science and Technology Liaoning， Anshan 114051， China.

Published:2022-09-16
Contact: GONG Ya-dong
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用非接触测量方法对锆刚玉砂带(P120，P320)与陶瓷氧化铝砂带(P120)三维形貌进行测量与评价.结果表明:锆刚玉砂带和陶瓷氧化铝砂带磨粒凸出高度分别呈正态分布、右偏态分布.锆刚玉砂带和陶瓷氧化铝砂带磨粒凸出面积均呈右偏态分布.磨粒凸出高度和凸出面积随磨料粒度的减小而减小，陶瓷氧化铝砂带磨粒凸出高度和凸出面积均小于同粒度锆刚玉砂带.砂带磨粒几何外形均近似呈球顶圆锥体.磨料粒度对磨粒球顶半径影响显著，即粒度越小，球顶半径越小，但对锥顶角影响不明显.同粒度的两种磨料砂带的磨粒球顶半径及锥顶角差异较大.

关键词: 砂带形貌；非接触测量；磨粒；粒度；外形参数

Abstract: The non-contact measurement method is used to measure and evaluate the three-dimensional morphology of zirconia abrasive belts(P120， P320)and ceramic alumina belt(P120). The results show that the protrusion height of the zirconia abrasive belt and ceramic alumina belt is in the normal distribution and right-skewness distribution respectively. The protrusion area of the zirconia abrasive belt and ceramic alumina belt is both in the right polarized distribution. The protrusion height and area of abrasive grains decrease with the decrease of grain size. The protrusion height and area of abrasive grains in the ceramic alumina belt are smaller than those in the zirconia abrasive belt. The geometric shapes of the abrasive grains of the abrasive belts are similar to the spherical-top cone. The grain size has a significant effect on the spherical-top radius， i.e.， the smaller the grain size， the smaller the spherical-top radius， but the effect on the cone apex angle is not significant. There are great differences in the spherical-top radius and cone apex angle of the two abrasive belts with the same particle size.

Key words: abrasive belt morphology; non-contact measurement; abrasive grain; grain size; profile parameter

中图分类号:

TH161

张伟健，巩亚东，赵旭，赵显力. 砂带表面形貌测量与评价研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 43(9): 1277-1282.

ZHANG Wei-jian， GONG Ya-dong， ZHAO Xu， ZHAO Xian-li. Investigation on the Measurement and Evaluation of Abrasive Belt Surface Morphology[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2022, 43(9): 1277-1282.

参考文献

[1]黄云，黄智.现代砂带磨削技术及工程应用［M］.重庆:重庆大学出版社，2009:57-60.(Huang Yun，Huang Zhi.Modern belt grinding technology and engineering application ［M］.Chongqing:Chongqing University Press，2009:57-60.)
[2]Xie J，Xu J，Tang Y，et al.3D graphical evaluation of micron-scale protrusion topography of diamond grinding wheel［J］.International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture，2008，48(11):1254-1260.
[3]Nguyen A T，Butler D L.Correlation of grinding wheel topography and grinding performance:a study from a viewpoint of three-dimensional surface characterization［J］.Journal of Materials Processing Technology，2008，208(1/2/3):14-23.
[4]Darafon A，Warkentin A，Bauer R.Characterization of grinding wheel topography using a white chromatic sensor［J］.International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture，2013，70:22-31.
[5]Kaponek W，Nadolny K.Assessment of the grinding wheel active surface condition using SEM and image analysis techniques ［J］.Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering，2013，35(3):207-215.
[6]McDonald A，Bauer R，Warkentin A.Design and validation of a grinding wheel optical scanner system to repeatedly measure and characterize wheel surface topography［J］.Measurement，2016，93:541-551.
[7]王文玺，李建勇，樊文刚，等.砂带三维表面形貌特征量化评价方法［J］.华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)，2016，44(12):14-22.(Wang Wen-xi，Li Jian-yong，Fan Wen-gang，et al.Quantitative evaluation method for 3D surface topography of abrasive belt［J］.Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)，2016，44(12):14-22.)
[8]何喆，李建勇，刘月明，等.砂带虚拟形貌的建模［J］.华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)，2017，45(12):85-91，105.(He Zhe，Li Jian-yong，Liu Yue-ming，et al.Modeling of virtual topography of abrasive belt［J］.Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)，2017，45(12):85-91，105.)
[9]刘伟，商圆圆，邓朝晖，等.砂轮表面形貌定量评价及修整效果研究［J］.中国机械工程，2018，29(19):2277-2283.(Liu Wei，Shang Yuan-yuan，Deng Zhao-hui，et al.Study on quantitative evaluations and dressing effectiveness for surface topography of grinding wheels［J］.China Mechanical Engineering，2018，29(19):2277-2283.)
[10]Pang Z J，Wu C J，Wang Q X，et al.Modeling of grinding wheel topography based on a joint method of 3D microscopic observation and embedded grindable thermocouple technique ［J］.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2018，97(1/2/3/4):25-37.
[11]Tang J J，Qiu Z J，Li T Y.A novel measurement method and application for grinding wheel surface topography based on shape from focus［J］.Measurement，2019，133:495-507.
[12]Liu W，Deng Z H，Shang Y Y，et al.Parametric evaluation and three-dimensional modelling for surface topography of grinding wheel［J］.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2019，155:334-342.
[13]Kang M X，Zhang L，Tang W C.Study on three-dimensional topography modeling of the grinding wheel with image processing techniques ［J］.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，2020，167:237-242.
[14]Godino L，Pombo I，Sanchez J A，et al.Characterization of vitrified alumina grinding wheel topography using 3D roughness parameters:influence of the crystalline structure of abrasive grains ［J］.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2021，113(5/6):1673-1684.

[1]	温雪龙，王承宝，刘文博，任海洋. 选区激光熔化FeCoNiCr系高熵合金微观组织的实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 44(4): 536-543.
[2]	焦安源，张国富，丁浩东，刘伟军. TC4钛合金孔的磁粒研磨试验[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(9): 1304-1310.
[3]	马廉洁，左宇辰，周云光，付海玲. 氧化锆陶瓷车削刀具几何参数的多目标优化[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(8): 1129-1134.
[4]	康程铭，赵春雨，付立新. 基于物理建模法的加工中心主轴热误差建模[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(4): 528-533.
[5]	周云光，董彪，岳新伟，谭雁清. 牙科氧化锆陶瓷微尺度磨削力研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(4): 557-562.
[6]	杨玉莹，巩亚东，屈硕硕，蔡明. 增/减材复合加工316L宏观形貌和残余应力试验[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(3): 380-386.
[7]	李明，于天彪，张荣闯，王宛山. 基于石墨烯强化MQL的GH4169合金铣削表面质量研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(3): 387-392.
[8]	温雪龙，于兴晨，巩亚东，孟凡涛. FeCoNiCrMo高熵合金磨削机理及表面粗糙度[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(2): 246-251.
[9]	屈硕硕，巩亚东，杨玉莹，舍跃斌. 2.5D C_f/SiC复合材料磨削工艺试验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 41(2): 252-257.
[10]	于天彪，刘传蒙，于奎东，王宛山. 激光热辅助磨削石英玻璃的实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(10): 1467-1473.
[11]	屈硕硕，巩亚东，杨玉莹，蔡明. 单向碳纤维增强陶瓷基复合材料磨削表面质量研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(9): 1310-1315.
[12]	尹国强，巩亚东，李雨晴，宋俊利. 新型点磨削砂轮磨削表面/亚表面质量研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(6): 835-840.
[13]	田英健，邹平，陈硕，温泉. 轴向超声振动辅助钻削机理与试验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(5): 705-709.
[14]	蔡明，巩亚东，屈硕硕，杨玉莹. 镍基单晶高温合金磨削表面质量及亚表面微观组织试验[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(3): 386-391.
[15]	蔡明，巩亚东，冯耀利，刘瑶佳. 镍基高温合金磨削表面工艺性能试验研究[J]. 东北大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 40(2): 234-238.

砂带表面形貌测量与评价研究

Investigation on the Measurement and Evaluation of Abrasive Belt Surface Morphology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价