技术物是道德行动者吗?——维贝克“技术道德化”思想及其内在困境

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2017.03.001

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 221-226.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2017.03.001

• 科技哲学研究 • 下一篇

技术物是道德行动者吗?——维贝克“技术道德化”思想及其内在困境

刘铮

(北京大学哲学系，北京100871)

收稿日期:2016-07-15 修回日期:2016-07-15 出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2017-05-19
通讯作者: 刘铮
作者简介:刘铮(1989-)，男，山东高密人，北京大学博士研究生，主要从事技术哲学研究。
基金资助:
-

Can Technical Artifacts Be Moral Agents?——Verbeek's Theory of Technological Moralization and Its Internal Predicament

LIU Zheng

(Department of Philosophy， Peking University， Beijing 100871， China)

Received:2016-07-15 Revised:2016-07-15 Online:2017-05-25 Published:2017-05-19
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

维贝克的“技术道德化”思想认为技术物调节着人的道德行为和道德决策，技术物不仅“有”意向性，而且也可以成为“道德行动者”。维贝克的批评者则认为维贝克是通过重新定义概念和误用概念的方式来克服他所遇到的理论困境的，维贝克因而陷入了内在困境中。一方面，维贝克对概念进行重新解释使得他与批评者之间的争执更像是一场能否用“道德行动者”来描述技术物的某种道德作用的“语词之争”。另一方面，维贝克戏剧性地接受了他所批判的传统人本主义伦理学的概念框架，他的技术道德化思想仍然是现代性主客二分哲学传统的翻版。

关键词: 维贝克, 技术物, 道德行动者, 技术道德化, 技术意向性

Abstract:

Verbeek's theory of technological moralization claims that technical artifacts can mediate human's moral behaviors and moral decisions， i.e.， technical artifacts not only have intentionality， but also can serve as moral agents. Verbeek's critics think that Verbeek justified his arguments by concept redefinition and misuse; as a result， Verbeek fell into the internal predicament. On one hand， the controversy between Verbeek and his critics is more like a terminological dispute about whether or not the moral roles of technical artifacts can be described as moral agents. On the other hand， Verbeek dramatically inherited the conceptual framework of humanistic ethics which he criticized， and his theory of technological moralization is still the duplication of modernistic dualism.

Key words: Peter-Paul Verbeek, technical artifact, moral agent, technological moralization, technological intentionality

中图分类号:

N031

刘铮. 技术物是道德行动者吗?——维贝克“技术道德化”思想及其内在困境[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 19(3): 221-226.

LIU Zheng. Can Technical Artifacts Be Moral Agents?——Verbeek's Theory of Technological Moralization and Its Internal Predicament[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2017, 19(3): 221-226.

参考文献

[1]Ihde D. Peter-Paul Verbeek and a Postphenomenological Mirror［J］. Philos. Technol.， 2014，27:292-296.
[2]Verbeek P. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things［M］. Chicago: University of Chicago Press， 2011.
[3]Verbeek P. Expanding Mediation Theory［J］. Found Sci.， 2012，17:391-395.
[4]Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern［M］. Cambridge: Harvard University Press， 1993:9.
[5]Verbeek P. Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation［J］. Science Technology & Human Values， 2006，31:361-380.
[6]Kroes P， Verbeek P. Introduction: The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts［C］∥ The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Dordrecht:Springer Press， 2014.
[7]Verbeek P. Some Misunderstandings About the Moral Significance of Technology［C］∥The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer Press， 2014:75-88.
[8]Peterson M， Spahn A. Can Technological Artefacts Be Moral Agents?［J］. Science Engineering Ethics， 2011，17:411-424.
[9]Illies C， Meijers A. Artefacts Without Agency［J］. The Monist， 2009，92(3):420-440.
[10]Peterson M. Three Objections to Verbeek［J］. Philos. Technol.， 2014，27:301-308.
[11]Van de Poel I. Technology as Moral Agent［J］. Philos. Technol.， 2012，25:615-619.
[12]Brey P. From Moral Agents to Moral Factors: The Structural Ethics Approach［C］∥The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Dordrecht:Springer Press， 2014:125-142.
[13]Pitt J. “Guns Don't Kill， People Kill”: Values in and/or Around Technologies［C］∥The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Dordrecht:Springer Press， 2014:89-102.
[14]Mitcham C. Agency in Humans and in Artifacts: A Contested Discourse［C］∥The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Dordrecht:Springer Press， 2014:11-30.
[15]Smith D. Rewriting the Constitution: A Critique of“Postphenomenology”［J］. Philos. Technol.， 2015，28:533-551.

技术物是道德行动者吗?——维贝克“技术道德化”思想及其内在困境

Can Technical Artifacts Be Moral Agents?——Verbeek's Theory of Technological Moralization and Its Internal Predicament

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张秋成. 海德格尔后期技术哲学方法之辨:“先验”抑或“经验”?——对Verbeek式解读的回应[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(6): 551-556.
[2]	吴国林，李小平，李君亮. 技术哲学的内在逻辑分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(5): 441-446.