东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 61-69.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.01.008

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

党内问责对象不精准的表现、成因与对策

吕永祥   

  1. (武汉大学党内法规研究中心,湖北武汉430072)
  • 发布日期:2021-02-08
  • 通讯作者: 吕永祥
  • 作者简介:吕永祥(1988-),男,安徽亳州人,武汉大学讲师,法学博士,主要从事党内问责研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(20YJC710045);国家社会科学基金资助项目(20BZZ080);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(17JZD003)。

Manifestations, Causes, and Countermeasures of the Intra-party Accountability Objects Inaccuracy

LYU Yongxiang   

  1. (Institution of Inner-party Laws and Regulations, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Published:2021-02-08
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 借鉴系统论的整体性原理,从个体、组织、个体与组织关系三个层面可构建问责对象不精准的整体性分析框架。从该框架来看,问责对象不精准表现为:在个体层面,以问责一般干部代替问责领导干部,以问责现任领导干部代替问责时任领导干部;在组织层面,以问责下级组织代替问责上级组织,以问责属地机关代替问责垂直管理部门;在个体与组织关系层面,个体问责与集体问责相互代替。党内问责对象不精准的成因包括:在个体层面,混淆执纪对象与问责对象,终身问责机制不健全;在组织层面,职责同构的政党职责体系,垂管部门滥发“责任状”;在个体与组织关系层面,个体与集体责任划分不清晰,避责策略的消极影响。其治理对策在于:在个体层面,区分执纪对象和问责对象,健全终身问责机制;在组织层面,构建职责异构的政党职责体系,清理垂管部门发布的“责任状”;在个体与组织关系层面,清晰划分个体责任和集体责任,以集体问责和个体问责配合使用抑制避责策略。

关键词: 党内问责; 问责对象; 系统论; 精准问责

Abstract: Based on the holistic principle of system theory, the overall analysis framework for the inaccuracy of the intra-party accountability objects can be constructed from the three levels of individual, organization, and the relations between the individual and organization. From the perspective of the holistic analysis framework, the manifestations of the inaccuracy of the intra-party accountability objects are as follows: at the individual level, accountable non-leading cadres are used to replace accountable leading cadres, and accountable current leaders are used to replace accountable incumbent cadres; at the organizational level, accountable lower-level organizations are used to replace accountable higher-level organizations, and accountable territorial administrations are used to replace accountable vertical management departments; at the individual-organizational level, individual accountability and collective accountability are replaced with each other. Through investigation of its roots, it is found that the causes for the inaccuracy of accountability objects in the party include confusion of discipline objects with accountability objects and incompleteness of lifelong accountability mechanisms on the individual level; the party responsibilities systems of isomorphic responsibility and the spamming of responsibility contracts by vertical management departments on the organizational level; the unclear division of individual and collective responsibilities, and the negative influences of avoidance strategies on the level of the collective-organization relations. Countermeasures are as follows: at the individual level, correctly distinguish disciplined objects and accountability objects, and improve the life-long accountability mechanism; at the organizational level, build an isomerous party responsibility system, and clean up the “responsibility contracts” of vertical management departments; at the level of individual-organization relations, clearly separate individual and collective responsibilities, and combine collective accountability with individual accountability to curb blame-avoidance strategies.

Key words: intra-party accountability; accountability object; system theory; precision accountability

中图分类号: