我国知识产权间接侵权制度的立法构造兼论知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权的差异

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.03.012

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 295-300.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.03.012

我国知识产权间接侵权制度的立法构造兼论知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权的差异

王国柱

(吉林大学法学院，吉林长春130012)

收稿日期:2015-06-12 修回日期:2015-06-12 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-06-12
通讯作者: 王国柱
作者简介:王国柱(1981)，男，吉林榆树人，吉林大学讲师，法学博士，主要从事知识产权法研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(118ZD076);国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(13AFX015);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2014BS002)。

Legislative Structure of Indirect Infringement System of Chinas Intellectual Property Also on the Difference Between Indirect Infringement of Intellectual Property and Multiple Tortfeasors

WANG Guo-zhu

(Law School， Jilin University， Changchun 130012， China)

Received:2015-06-12 Revised:2015-06-12 Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-06-12
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 知识产权间接侵权制度的“目标导向”与多数人侵权制度的“意思导向”存在着根本区别，多数人侵权制度无法替代间接侵权制度，有必要对知识产权间接侵权进行法定化。我国关于知识产权间接侵权的立法虽有亮点，但总体上存在缺陷。应当在知识产权单行法中分别设立间接侵权规则，对知识产权间接侵权进行类型化和体系化的规定，并对知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权进行制度协调，进而对我国知识产权间接侵权制度进行立法完善。

关键词: 知识产权, 间接侵权, 直接侵权, 多数人侵权, 共同侵权

Abstract: There is a fundamental difference between the “goal orientation” of indirect infringement of intellectual property and the “meaning orientation” of multiple tortfeasors. Since the indirect infringement of intellectual property could not be replaced by multiple tortfeasors， it is necessary to enact the legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property. Although there are strengths in Chinas legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property， weaknesses do exist as a whole. The rules of indirect infringement of intellectual property should be set up respectively in the slip laws of intellectual property， the rules of indirect infringement of intellectual property should be categorized and systematized， and the indirect infringement system of intellectual property and multiple tortfeasors should be coordinated so as to perfect the legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property in China.

Key words: intellectual property, indirect infringement, direct infringement, multiple tortfeasor, joint infringement

中图分类号:

D923.4

王国柱. 我国知识产权间接侵权制度的立法构造兼论知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权的差异[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(3): 295-300.

WANG Guo-zhu. Legislative Structure of Indirect Infringement System of Chinas Intellectual Property Also on the Difference Between Indirect Infringement of Intellectual Property and Multiple Tortfeasors[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2015, 17(3): 295-300.

参考文献

Arnett J J. Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens Through the Twenties［J］. American Psychologist， 2000，55:469480.
李静. 大学新生适应不良问题与心理调适的对策探析［J］. 思想理论教育导刊， 2013(1):118120.
刘新芝，程化琴，高维钫. 大学如何面对大学新生的恋爱期待［J］. 中国性科学， 2012，21(10):6468.
Gerdes H， Mallinckrodt B. Emotional， Social， and Academic Adjustment of College Students: A Longitudinal Study of Retention［J］. Journal of Counseling and Development， 1994，72:281288.
Crede M， Niehorster S. Adjustment to College as Measured by the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A Quantitative Review of Its Structure and Relationships with Correlates and Consequences［J］. Educational Psychology Review， 2012，24(1):133165.
柳友荣. 大学新生负性生活事件与心理教育内容确立的实验研究［J］. 心理科学， 2004，24(5):12421244.
吴静. 促进大学生健康自我同一性形成之研究基于大学新生阶段［J］. 福建工程学院学报， 2013，11(5):457461.
周国平. 城乡大学新生的成长期望研究基于浙江的调查［J］. 保定学院学报， 2012，25(1):104110.
杨钋，毛丹. “适应”大学新生发展的关键词基于首都高校学生发展调查的实证分析［J］. 中国高教研究， 2013(3):1624.
Nuez A M， Cuccaro-Alamin S. First-generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education (NCES 1999-030)［R］. Washington， D. C.: U. S. Department of Education， 1998.
Mattanah J F， Ayers J F， Brand B L， et al. A Social Support Intervention to Ease the College Transition Exploring Main Effects and Moderators［J］. Journal of College Student Development， 2010，51:93108.
匡文波. “新媒体”概念辨析［J］. 国际新闻界， 2008(6):6669.
中国互联网信息中心. 2014年中国社交类应用用户行为研究报告［EB/OL］. (20140822)［20150311］. http:∥www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201408/P020140822379356612744.pdf.
Jones S. The Internet Goes to College: Pew Internet & American Life Project［EB/OL］. (20140624)［2015120］. http:∥www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_College_Report.pdf.
Madge C， Meek J， Wellens J， et al. Facebook， Social Integration and Informal Learning at University:“It Is More for Socialising and Talking to Friends About Work than for Actually Doing Work”［J］. Learning， Media and Technology， 2009，34:141155.
Heiberger G， Harper R. Have You Facebooked Astin Lately? Using Technology to Increase Student Involvement［J］. New Directions for Student Services， 2008，124:1935.
Ranney J D， Troop-Gordon W. Computer-mediated Communication with Distant Friends: Relations with Adjustment During Students First Semester at College［J］. Journal of Educational Psychology， 2012，104:848861.
Gray R， Vitak J， Easton E W， et al. Examining Social Adjustment to College in the Age of Social Media: Factors Influencing Successful Transitions and Persistence［J］. Computers & Education， 2013，67:193207.
Smith S， Salaway G，Borreson C J. The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology［EB/OL］. (20140509)［20150329］. http:∥www.educause.edu/ecar.
Hertel J B. College Student Generational Status: Similarities， Differences， and Factors in College Adjustment［J］. The Psychological Record， 2002，52:318.(责任编辑:付示威)(上接第281页)
Norman-Major K. Balancing the Four Es， or Can We Achieve Equity for Social Equity in Public Administration?［J］. Journal of Public Affairs Education， 2011，17(2) :233252.
Osborne S P. The New Public Management［J］. Public Management Review， 2006，8(3):377387.
Koppenjan J F M， Klijn E H. Managing Uncertainties in Network:A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making［M］. London: Routledge， 2004.
Pollitt C S， van Thiel， Homberg V. New Public Management in Europe［M］. Basingstoke: Palgrave， 2007.
Bouckaert G， Peters B， Verhoest K. The Coordination of Public Sector Organization: Shifting Pattern of Public Management［M］. Basingstoke: MacMillan， 2010.
周春山，高军波. 转型期中国城市公共服务设施供给模式及其形成机制研究［J］. 地理科学， 2011，3(3):272279.
金世斌. 公共服务供给机制创新:北欧的改革实践与启示［J］. 南京社会科学， 2012(7):8187.
Warner M E， Hefetz A. Managing Markets for Public Service:The Role of Mixed Public/Private Delivery of City Service［J］. Public Administration Review， 2008，68(1):155166.
Bel G， Fageda X. Partial Privatization in Local Services Delivery: An Empirical Analysis of the Choice of Mixed Firms［J］. Local Government Studies， 2010，36(1):129149.
敬乂嘉. 政府与社会组织公共服务合作机制研究以上海市的实践为例［J］. 江西社会科学， 2013(4):165170.(责任编辑:付示威)

[1]	费艳颖，赵亮. 枫桥经验视域下我国知识产权纠纷人民调解制度及其完善[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(4): 398-404.
[2]	毛牧然，乔磊，陈凡. 完善知识产权保护促进网络文化产业发展[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(1): 18-23.
[3]	丛立先;张潇潇;. 论网络知识产权侵权案件的地域管辖[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2011, 32(5): 432-437.
[4]	王鹏;谢冬慧;. 论侵害知识产权的不当得利请求权[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2009, 11(5): 443-448.
[5]	张尤佳;赵凯;. 试析高新技术知识产权保护的最佳法律选择[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2005, 7(6): 442-444.
[6]	陈凡;唐丽. 技术发展中的知识产权制度及对技术的整合[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2004, 6(1): 12-14.
[7]	李国青;娄成武. 我国对外科技合作中存在的问题及对策[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 5(5): 349-351.
[8]	王江. 从"DVD专利事件"看企业核心技术的重要性[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 5(1): 34-36.
[9]	李运萍. 加强知识产权保护促进高校技术创新[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2000, 2(4): 245-247.

我国知识产权间接侵权制度的立法构造兼论知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权的差异

Legislative Structure of Indirect Infringement System of Chinas Intellectual Property Also on the Difference Between Indirect Infringement of Intellectual Property and Multiple Tortfeasors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价