东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 441-445.DOI: -

• 科技哲学研究 •    下一篇

近代科学诞生的科学文化哲学基础

李宏伟   

  1. (华中师范大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430079)
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-20 修回日期:2013-03-20 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 李宏伟
  • 作者简介:李宏伟(1963-),男,河北任丘人,华中师范大学教授,哲学博士,主要从事科学技术哲学、科学技术文化研究。
  • 基金资助:
    -

Philosophical Bases of Scientific Culture in the Birth of Modern Science

LI Hong-wei   

  1. (School of Marxism, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Received:2013-03-20 Revised:2013-03-20 Online:2013-09-25 Published:2015-11-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 近代科学的诞生不能仅仅找寻“外部”社会原因,更重要的还是要回归其“内部”探究近代科学观念形成的科学文化哲学基础。近代科学的诞生不是某一主导科学文化哲学思想的单一成果,而是各种不同科学文化哲学思想的杂交和共生。亚里士多德哲学的理性追求、新柏拉图主义的神秘启示以及机械主义的祛魅思想为近代科学的诞生奠定了科学文化哲学思想基础。科学文化哲学不同于一般思想史、哲学史的系统性,而是表达文化的多元追求和包容,这可能更接近历史的真实,也是我们理解科学的有效途径。

关键词: 科学文化哲学, 亚里士多德哲学, 新柏拉图主义, 机械主义, 祛魅

Abstract: To explore the birth of modern science, it is important to look for the “outer” social causes, but it is even more important to go back to the “inner” to study the philosophical bases of scientific culture. The birth of modern science is not a child born of only one dominant philosophy of scientific culture, but of the interaction and coexistence of different philosophies of scientific culture. The pursuit of rationality in Aristotles philosophy, the mysterious inspiration of Neo-Platonism and the thought of disenchantment in mechanism have built up the philosophical foundation of scientific culture for the birth of modern science. Different from the systematization of history of thought or history of philosophy, philosophy of scientific culture tends to expresses many-sided pursuit and tolerance of culture. Therefore, it may be closer to the truth of history and turns out to be an effective way for us to understand science.

Key words: philosophy of scientific culture, Aristotelianism, Neo-Platonism, mechanism, disenchantment

中图分类号: