Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 160-166.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2017.02.008
• Politics and Public Management • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Zhen-bo
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
About author:
Supported by:
-
Abstract:
As a rheological type of public policy， “short-lived” policies may be caused by the following mechanisms: the combination between the closed mechanism of policymaking and the pursuit of efficiency， the binding between the release of short-term policies and the pursuit of interests， and the adherence between the promotion & tenure system and the pursuit of political achievements. The reasons behind the above-mentioned generation mechanisms highlight the deficiency of public reasoning， lack of democratic mechanism， ignorance of scientific procedure of policymaking and more room for system and regulation improvement. Although there are some explicit-level counter-mechanisms to terminate the generation mechanisms of “short-lived” policies， including the top-down government power system， the bottom-up social pressure and other counter factors， a fundamental solution to “short-lived” policies should take into account the following issues-unconformity to laws， illegality in content and procedures， lack of public support in reasoning， and inadequate maintenance of policy operating mechanisms.
Key words: “short-lived&rdquo, policy, generating mechanism, public governance, scientific decision
CLC Number:
D035
WANG Zhen-bo. On the Inner Logic of the Generation-Termination of “Short-lived” Policies[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2017, 19(2): 160-166.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2017.02.008
http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/Y2017/V19/I2/160
[1]欧阳丹霞. “政策短命”现象及其治理研究［D］. 广州:广州大学公共管理学院， 2013. [2]李春成. 政府短期行为分析［J］. 行政与法， 1999(4):46-47. [3]苏天旺. 谈公共政策中的短期化倾向及其对价值取向的影响［J］. 云南行政学院学报， 2002，4(3):26-29. [4]锁茜. 转型期地方政府行为偏差及调整［J］. 河南商业高等专科学校学报， 2003，16(2):5-8. [5]万仕好. 短期行为的成因与对策［J］. 决策咨询， 2002(8):45. [6]姜淑芝，赵连章. 论地方政府的短期行为及整治对策［J］. 科学社会主义， 1997(3):61-65. [7]陈潭. 朝令夕改的治理逻辑［J］. 决策， 2011(11):76-77. [8]孟华. 政府短期行为成因的决策要素分析［J］. 地方政府管理， 1998(1):32-33. [9]张进军. 传统发展战略下的地方政府短期行为［D］. 上海:复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院， 2010. [10]陈茂先. 汽车破坏性试验对避免“短命”公共政策的启示［J］. 领导科学， 2010(15):26-27. [11]孙立平. 短期行为与社会的制度安排［J］. 探索与争鸣， 1996(4):10-14. [12]邓勇. 加强政令“短命”的行政法律规制［J］. 党政论坛， 2012(2):23-25. [13]唐贤兴，唐豫鹏. 社会转型时期的公共政策:走出短期化的诱惑［J］. 理论学习月刊， 1997(2):11-17. [14]Bardach E. Policy Termination as a Political Process［J］. Policy Sciences， 1976，7(2): 123-131. [15]吴锡泓，金荣. 政策学的主要理论［M］. 金东日，译. 上海:复旦大学出版社， 2004:494. [16]Daniels M R. Policy and Organizational Termination［J］. International Journal of Public Administration， 2006，24(3):250. [17]Behn R D. How to Terminate a Public Policy:A Dozen Hints for the Would-be Terminator［J］. Policy Analysis， 1978，4(3):394-409. [18]魏蒙. 广东江门“禁犬令”被收回，政令出台何时不再“拍脑袋”［EB/OL］.［2016-04-20］. http:∥news.xinhuanet.com/local/2011-08/04/c_121812506.htm. [19]丁煌. 西方行政学说史［M］. 武汉:武汉大学出版社， 2004:343-347. [20]张家口“草原天路”取消50元门票 此前曾引争议［EB/OL］.［2016-05-22］. http:∥news.qq.com/a/20160521/008462.htm. [21]“政绩工程”如何收场?全国663个“形象工程”“政绩工程”被叫停［EB/OL］.［2016-05-26］.http:∥news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-10/14/c_1112823898.htm. [22]中华人民共和国宪法(全文)［EB/OL］.［2016-05-26］.http:∥www.people.com.cn/GB/shehui/1060/ 2391834.html. [23]薛晓源，刘国良. 全球风险世界:现在与未来——德国著名社会学家、风险社会理论创始人乌尔里希·贝克教授访谈录［J］. 马克思主义与现实， 2005(1):44-55. [24]安东尼·吉登斯. 现代性——吉登斯访谈录［M］. 尹宏毅，译. 北京:新华出版社， 2001:218. [25]刘京希. 政治生态论:政治发展的生态学考察［M］. 济南:山东大学出版社， 2007:16.
