基于追踪修正和单词处理器的英语写作纠错反馈研究

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.06.015

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 649-656.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.06.015

基于追踪修正和单词处理器的英语写作纠错反馈研究

苗佳

(东北大学外国语学院，辽宁沈阳110819)

收稿日期:2018-03-20 修回日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-11-22
通讯作者: 苗佳
作者简介:苗佳(1977-)，男，吉林白城人，东北大学副教授，主要从事外语电化教学、二语习得研究。
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题资助项目(DIA150292)。

Research of English Writing Revision Feedback Based on Track Correction and Word Treater

MIAO Jia

(Foreign Studies College， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China)

Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-03-20 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-11-22
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考察了计算机为媒介的英语写作纠错反馈中的追踪修正、单词处理器、追踪修正和单词处理器混合三种技术类型的有效性。以影响语法习得的时间效应为出发点，以11种主要类型的错误为研究材料，选取了64名在校大学生为对象，通过历时九周的八个写作任务和三次测验，分析了三种计算机媒介交际技术对于写作纠错的作用机理。研究结果表明:学生写作成绩的平均错误和平均反馈有所降低，在即时、延时后测中，纠错反馈呈现显著性，特别是采用追踪修正和单词处理器混合类型的实验组最为明显。因此，在写作中追踪修正和单词处理器混合采用可引发更精准、更持久的语法准确度。

关键词: 纠错反馈, 英语写作, 同伴评价, 追踪修正, 单词处理器

Abstract: The effectiveness was explored of three technological types on revision feedback of computer-mediated English writing—track correction， word treater， and mixed use of track correction and word treater. Starting from the time effect of grammar acquisition and choosing 64 university students， the functional mechanisms of three computer-mediated technological types on writing feedback were analyzed with 11 error types as research materials through 9-week eight writing tasks and three tests. The experiment results showed that the mean errors and mean feedbacks of student writings both decline and in the immediate test and delayed test the revision feedback is of significance， especially for the group adopting the mixed track correction and word treater. Therefore， the mixed use of track correction and word treater is likely to result in more precise and lasting grammatical accuracy in English writing.

Key words: revision feedback, English writing, peer review, track correction, word treater

中图分类号:

H319

苗佳. 基于追踪修正和单词处理器的英语写作纠错反馈研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(6): 649-656.

MIAO Jia. Research of English Writing Revision Feedback Based on Track Correction and Word Treater[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2018, 20(6): 649-656.

参考文献

[1]朱秋娟. 反馈机制与写作教学——国内外研究及对大学英语写作教学的启示［J］. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版)， 2010(3):160-162.
[2]周一书. 大学英语写作反馈方式的对比研究［J］. 外语界， 2013(3):87-96.
[3]刘永厚. 英语专业写作小组同伴反馈和教师反馈效果研究［J］. 外语界， 2015(1):48-55.
[4]王洁卿. 计算机中介交流在外语教学中的应用研究述评［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2012(5):775-783.
[5]Schmidt R. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning［J］. Applied Linguistics， 1990，11(2):129-158.
[6]Sauro S H. Computer-mediated Corrective Feedback and the Development of L2 Grammar［J］. Language Learning & Technology， 2009，13(1):96-120.
[7]Krashen S. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition［M］. London: Longman， 1982:87.
[8]Krashen S. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications［M］. London:Longman， 1985:98.
[9]Panova I， Lyster R. Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom［J］. TESOL Quarterly， 2002，36(4):573-595.
[10]Canale M，Swain M. Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2000，34(1):1-47.
[11]Ellis R. A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types［J］. ELT Journal， 2009， 63(3):97-107.
[12]陈晓湘，李会娜. 教师书面修正反馈对学生英语写作的影响［J］. 外语教学与研究， 2009(5):351-359.
[13]Ellis R，Sheen Y. The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context［J］. System， 2008，36:353-371.
[14]Bitchener J，Ferris D R. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing［M］. New York: Routledge， 2012:382.
[15]Sheen Y. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles［J］. TESOL Quarterly， 2007，41(6):255-283.
[16]Bitchener J， Knoch U. Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2008，17(2):102-118.
[17]Truscott J，Hsu A Y-P. Error Correction， Revision， and Learning［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2008，17(4):292-305.
[18]van Beuningen C G，de Jong N. Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing［J］. Language Learning， 2012，62(1):1-41.
[19]Chandler J. The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2003，12(2):267-296.
[20]Kang E Y，Han Z. The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-analysis［J］.Modern Language Journal， 2015，99(5):1-18.
[21]Bitchener J，Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation［J］. Applied Linguistics， 2010，31(2):193-214.
[22]Williams J. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning［M］. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates， 2005:120.
[23]苏建红. Bruton与Truscott二语写作语法纠错之争［J］. 现代外语， 2014(6):855-863.
[24]邢加新，代尊峰. 《第二语言习得与写作中的书面修正性反馈》介评［J］. 现代外语， 2014(1):137-140.
[25]Ashwell T. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2000，67(9):227-257.
[26]Norris J M，Ortega L. Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis［J］. Language Learning， 2000，50(2):417-528.
[27]Li Shaofeng. The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA: A Meta-analysis［J］. Language Learning， 2010，60(2):309-365.
[28]Polio C. The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate［J］. Journal of Second Language Writing， 2012，21(3):375-389.
[29]Blake R. Computer-mediated Communication: A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage［J］. Language Learning & Technology， 2000，4(1):120-136.
[30]Gurzynski-Weiss L，Baralt M. Exploring Learner Perception and Use of Task-based Interactional Feedback in FTF and CMC Modes［J］. Studies in Second Language Acquisition， 2014，36(1):1-37.［31］Lai Chun，Zhao Yong. Noticing and Text-based Chat［J］. Language Learning & Technology， 2006，10(3):102-120.［32］Satar H，Ozdener N. The Effect of Synchronous CMC on Speaking Proficiency and Anxiety: Text Versus Voice-chat［J］. Modern Language Journal， 2008，92(2):595-613.［33］Yilmaz Y. The Relative Effects of Explicit Correction and Recasts on Two Target Structures Via Two Communication Modes［J］. Language Learning， 2012，62(4):1-36.［34］蔡基刚. 中国大学生英语写作在线同伴反馈和教师反馈对比研究［J］. 外语界， 2011(2):65-72.［35］白丽茹. 基础英语写作同伴互评反馈模式的可行性及有效性检验［J］. 解放军外国语学院学报， 2013(1):51-56.［36］Kellogg R T. Competition for Working Memory Among Writing Processes［J］. The American Journal of Psychology， 2001，114(2):175-191.［37］Galbraith D，van Waes L，Torrance M. Writing and Cognition［M］. Oxford: Elsevier， 2009:145.［38］Lyster R，Saito K，Sato M. Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language Classrooms［J］. Language Teaching， 2013，46(3):1-40.［39］Long M H. Problems in SLA［M］. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum， 2008:190.

基于追踪修正和单词处理器的英语写作纠错反馈研究

Research of English Writing Revision Feedback Based on Track Correction and Word Treater

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张春良;. 大学英语写作中的母语负迁移及教学启示[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2007, 9(6): 544-547.
[2]	刘哲;王佳平. 对负语用迁移影响英语写作的分析与对策[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 5(3): 217-219.
[3]	李素菊. 对大学生英语写作存在的问题分析与对策[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2002, 4(2): 137-138.
[4]	姚丽强. 论交际语言教学原则指导下的英语写作[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 1999, 1(2): 59-61.