东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 551-556.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.06.001

• 科技哲学研究 •    下一篇

海德格尔后期技术哲学方法之辨:“先验”抑或“经验”?——对Verbeek式解读的回应

张秋成   

  1. (东北大学马克思主义学院，辽宁沈阳110819)
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-17 修回日期:2016-05-17 出版日期:2016-11-25 发布日期:2016-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 张秋成
  • 作者简介:张秋成(1970-)，男(回族)，吉林长春人，东北大学副教授，哲学博士，主要从事科技哲学、逻辑学研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金资助项目(12BZX017);陈昌曙技术哲学发展基金资助项目(201202)。

Debate on Heideggers Research Method of His Later Philosophy of Technology: Transcendental or Empirical? A Response to Verbeeks Interpretation

ZHANG Qiu-cheng   

  1. (School of Marxism， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China)
  • Received:2016-05-17 Revised:2016-05-17 Online:2016-11-25 Published:2016-11-18
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:

    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

825

摘要：

维贝克在What Things Do一书中对海德格尔后期技术哲学的研究方法进行批判，认为海氏没有面向“技术人工物”本身，他的研究方法是“先验”或非“经验”的。这是一种误读，其根源是混淆了“先验的可能性条件”和“本质”，并且把技术单纯理解为人工物。海德格尔后期技术哲学方法“现象学解构”是现象学的“经验”方法，不是维贝克的自然主义“经验”方法。技术哲学研究应该跨越“具体”和“抽象、整体化”之争，后期海德格尔和维贝克两种技术哲学的研究对象应该进行整合。

关键词: 维贝克, 海德格尔, 技术哲学, 后现象学, 先验, 可能性条件

Abstract:

In his book What Things Do， Verbeek criticizes Heideggers research method of his later philosophy of technology， which is thought to be transcendental rather than empirical in that Heidegger fails to face artifacts themselves. It is a misinterpretation because Verbeek mistakes the possible conditions of transcendentalism for the essence， and views technology merely as artifacts. Heideggers phenomenological deconstruction of his later philosophy of technology is an empirical method of phenomenology instead of the one of Verbeeks naturalism. Studies on the philosophy of technology are supposed to transcend the debate of concreteness and abstractness as well as holism. Moreover， the research objects of later Heidegger and Verbeek should be integrated.

Key words: Peter-Paul Verbeek, Martin Heidegger, philosophy of teachnology, post-phenomenoloy, transcendentalism, possible condition

中图分类号: