东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 59-65.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.01.009

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高压反腐下行政不作为的发生机理与治理机制——以问责要素的系统分析为视角

吕永祥,王立峰   

  1. (吉林大学行政学院,吉林长春130012)
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-26 修回日期:2017-05-26 出版日期:2018-01-25 发布日期:2018-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 吕永祥
  • 作者简介:吕永祥(1988-),男, 安徽亳州人,吉林大学博士研究生,主要从事国家监察体制改革和行政不作为研究;王立峰(1976-),男,辽宁鞍山人,吉林大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事国家监察体制改革和廉政理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(17JZD003);国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BFX017)。

Generation Mechanism and Governance Mechanism of Administrative Inaction Under High-pressure Anti-corruption ——Based on a Systematic Analysis of Accountability Elements

LYU Yong-xiang, WANG Li-feng   

  1. (School of Administration, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
  • Received:2017-05-26 Revised:2017-05-26 Online:2018-01-25 Published:2018-01-19
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 目前学术界对行政不作为的既有研究主要从单一问责要素的角度展开,弥补这些研究不足需要从各问责要素和不同的行政不作为类型之间的关联入手建立行政不作为的“问责主体—问责对象—问责内容”三维分析框架。从该分析框架出发,高压反腐通过问责主体不合理的权责配置、问责对象的履责风险的提高和问责内容的不均衡设置分别产生行政主体“不能为”“不敢为”和“不愿为”的问题。基于此,应当将健全问责要素作为行政不作为的治理机制,通过合理配置问责主体的权责、降低问责对象的履责风险和设置均衡的问责内容分别切断上述三种行政不作为类型的发生机制,实现行政不作为的精准化治理。

关键词: 高压反腐, 行政不作为, 问责要素, 精准化治理

Abstract: At present, the existing studies on administrative inaction in the academia are mainly carried out from the perspective of a single element of accountability mechanism. Based on the previous research, this paper is unfolded with the correlation of various accountability elements and different types of administrative inaction with the purpose of constructing the three-dimension analysis framework of “accountability subject-accountability object-accountability content” of administrative inaction. Under this framework, three types of administrative inaction (cannot do, dare not to do and not willing to do) are generated respectively by aggravating the unreasonable right and liability allocation of accountability subject, responsibility-performing risk of accountability object and unbalanced setting of accountability content under high-pressure anti-corruption. On the basis of this analysis, the perfection of accountability elements should be regarded as the governance mechanism for administrative inaction. The generation mechanisms of the three types of administrative inaction mentioned above could be cut off through the reasonable allocation of right and liability of accountability subject, reducing responsibility-performing risk of accountability object and balanced accountability content, and the precise governance of administrative inaction would be realized.

Key words: high-pressure anti-corruption, administrative inaction, accountability element, precision governance

中图分类号: