东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 622-627.DOI: -

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

行政决策程序法制化的再研究

周实   

  1. (东北大学文法学院，辽宁沈阳110819)
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-10 修回日期:2014-04-10 出版日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 周实
  • 作者简介:周实(1958-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，东北大学教授，主要从事行政法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省法学会一般课题资助项目(LNFXH2014B009);大连市社会科学研究资助项目(2013dlskybdl001);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(DUT13RW428)。

Further Research on the Legalization of Administrative Decision-making Procedure

ZHOU Shi   

  1. (School of Humanities & Law， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110819， China)
  • Received:2014-04-10 Revised:2014-04-10 Online:2014-11-25 Published:2015-11-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

683

摘要： 我国已经在一定范围和程度上推行的行政决策程序，在执行中产生了信息量与真实性不足、专家不专、公民参与热情降低和监督乏力等新问题。分析了影响行政决策的主客观原因，针对存在的问题提出了完善行政决策程序法制化的对策，如确保行政决策信息的全面性与真实性，构建对专家的评价体系，建立和完善行政决策责任追究程序等，实现从形式到实质上保障行政决策程序的法制化。

关键词: 行政决策, 程序控制, 责任追究机制

Abstract: The administrative decision-making procedure has been implemented in a certain scope and to some degree in China; however， some new problems have arisen including insufficient and inaccurate information， unprofessional experts， citizens low enthusiasm and ineffective supervision. This paper analyses both subjective and objective factors that affect administrative decision-making， and proposes some countermeasures to perfect the legalization of administrative decision-making procedure， which include ensuring the completeness and authenticity of administrative decision-making information， constructing an expert assessment system， and improve the liability ascertainment mechanism so as to guarantee the legalization of administrative decision-making procedure both in form and in essence.

Key words: administrative decision making, procedure control, liability ascertainment mechanism

中图分类号: