东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 405-411.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.04.012

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非法集资行为的“国家规定”与司法判断标准——以行政犯相关理论为视角

胡彦涛1，刘莉2   

  1. (1.华南理工大学法治经济与法治社会研究中心，广东广州510640;2.辽宁省政府法制研究中心，辽宁沈阳110032)
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-20 修回日期:2018-01-20 出版日期:2018-07-25 发布日期:2018-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 胡彦涛
  • 作者简介:胡彦涛(1986-)，男，河南安阳人，华南理工大学博士后研究人员，主要从事行政法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BFX026，16BFX024)。

“National Regulations” and Judicial Judgment Standards for Illegal Fundraising——From Relevant Theories of Administrative Offenses

HU Yan-tao1， LIU Li2   

  1. (1. Rule-of-Law Economy and Rule-of-Law Society Research Center， South China University of Technology， Guangzhou 510640， China; 2. Legal Affairs Research Center of Liaoning Provincial Government， Shenyang 110032，China)
  • Received:2018-01-20 Revised:2018-01-20 Online:2018-07-25 Published:2018-07-25
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

1143

摘要： 非法集资类犯罪包括“集资诈骗罪”等刑事犯和“非法吸收公众存款罪”等行政犯。以“国家规定”为中心，可将非法集资类案件划分为四个类型:第一类型是合法的集资行为，这类集资行为不具有被认为是犯罪的可能;第二类型是非法集资行为，该类集资行为面临行政处罚等后果;第三类型是行政犯型非法集资犯罪，该类集资行为被“国家规定”认为是“非法”，满足了行政犯型非法集资犯罪的前提条件，司法机关可独立认定该集资是否构成犯罪;第四类型是刑事犯型非法集资类犯罪，该类非法集资案件同“国家规定”无直接关系。互联网金融被“国家规定”即《普惠金融发展规划》确认为合法，不应再被司法机关认为是犯罪。“地方规定”和地方政府的具体行政行为不属于“国家规定”，其对于集资性质的认定应该在行政诉讼中受到司法机关的审查。

关键词: 互联网金融, 非法集资, 空白罪状, 行政犯, 国家规定

Abstract: Illegal fundraising crimes include both “ndraising fraud”and other administrative offenses like “llegal deposits from the public” Focusing on “national regulations”， illegal fundraising cases can be divided into four types. The first type is legal fundraising which does not have the possibility of being considered a crime. The second type is illegal fundraising which faces administrative punishments and other consequences. The third type is illegal fundraising of administrative offences. This type of fundraising is considered “illegal” by the “national regulations” and satisfies the preconditions for illegal fundraising of administrative offences. Judicial organs can independently determine whether such fundraising behavior constitutes a crime. The fourth type is the illegal fundraising of criminal offenses which is not directly related to the “national regulations”. Internet Finance is recognized as legitimate by the “National Regulations”， namely Inclusive Financial Development Planning， and should not be considered a crime by the judiciary. "Local Regulations" and specific administrative acts of local government do not fall into the category of the “National Regulations”， and the identification of the nature of fundraising in view of the former should be censored in administrative proceedings.

Key words: Internet finance, illegal fundraising, blank facts about a crime, administrative offense, national regulations

中图分类号: