东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 649-656.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.06.015

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于追踪修正和单词处理器的英语写作纠错反馈研究

苗佳   

  1. (东北大学外国语学院,辽宁沈阳110819)
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-20 修回日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 苗佳
  • 作者简介:苗佳(1977-),男,吉林白城人,东北大学副教授,主要从事外语电化教学、二语习得研究。
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题资助项目(DIA150292)。

Research of English Writing Revision Feedback Based on Track Correction and Word Treater

MIAO Jia   

  1. (Foreign Studies College, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)
  • Received:2018-03-20 Revised:2018-03-20 Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-11-22
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 考察了计算机为媒介的英语写作纠错反馈中的追踪修正、单词处理器、追踪修正和单词处理器混合三种技术类型的有效性。以影响语法习得的时间效应为出发点,以11种主要类型的错误为研究材料,选取了64名在校大学生为对象,通过历时九周的八个写作任务和三次测验,分析了三种计算机媒介交际技术对于写作纠错的作用机理。研究结果表明:学生写作成绩的平均错误和平均反馈有所降低,在即时、延时后测中,纠错反馈呈现显著性,特别是采用追踪修正和单词处理器混合类型的实验组最为明显。因此,在写作中追踪修正和单词处理器混合采用可引发更精准、更持久的语法准确度。

关键词: 纠错反馈, 英语写作, 同伴评价, 追踪修正, 单词处理器

Abstract: The effectiveness was explored of three technological types on revision feedback of computer-mediated English writing—track correction, word treater, and mixed use of track correction and word treater. Starting from the time effect of grammar acquisition and choosing 64 university students, the functional mechanisms of three computer-mediated technological types on writing feedback were analyzed with 11 error types as research materials through 9-week eight writing tasks and three tests. The experiment results showed that the mean errors and mean feedbacks of student writings both decline and in the immediate test and delayed test the revision feedback is of significance, especially for the group adopting the mixed track correction and word treater. Therefore, the mixed use of track correction and word treater is likely to result in more precise and lasting grammatical accuracy in English writing.

Key words: revision feedback, English writing, peer review, track correction, word treater

中图分类号: