东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 112-119.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.05.014

• 马克思主义理论研究 • 上一篇    

“形而上学”命题对马克思真的有效吗?——重思海德格尔对马克思的论断

韩涛泽   

  1. (吉林大学哲学社会学院,吉林长春130012)
  • 修回日期:2021-06-24 接受日期:2021-06-24 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 韩涛泽
  • 作者简介:韩涛泽(1993-),男,山东滕州人,吉林大学博士研究生,主要从事哲学基础理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大资助项目(18JJD720002)。

Is the Proposition of “Metaphysics” Valid for Marx? Rethinking Heidegger's Judgment on Marx

HAN Taoze   

  1. (School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
  • Revised:2021-06-24 Accepted:2021-06-24 Published:2022-10-03
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: “形而上学”是海德格尔对马克思哲学的根本论断。海德格尔基于马克思的部分文本,主要从人道主义、黑格尔主义和技术集置等方面给马克思贴上了“形而上学”的标签,使得马克思对形而上学的现实超越之维变得蔽而不明。事实上,马克思的实践转向完成了对黑格尔哲学在内的理论形而上学的超越,类哲学完成了对近代以来主体性形而上学的扬弃,共产主义生产完成了对现代技术形而上学的驯服等。因此,“形而上学”命题在马克思这里并不完全有效,海德格尔关于形而上学的诊断和超越也依然值得质疑和反思。

关键词: 海德格尔; 马克思; 形而上学; 实践; 共产主义

Abstract: “Metaphysics” is Heidegger's fundamental judgment on Marx's philosophy. Based on Marx's partial texts, Heidegger regarded Marx's philosophy as “metaphysics” mainly from the aspects of humanism, Hegelianism and Ge-stell, which made Marx's practical transcendence of metaphysics become obscure. In fact, Marx's practice turn fulfilled the transcendence of the theoretical metaphysics including Hegel's philosophy, the species philosophy completed the sublation of the subjective metaphysics since the modern times, and the communist production completed the taming of the metaphysics of modern technology. Therefore, the proposition of “metaphysics” is not fully effective for Marx, and Heidegger's diagnosis and transcendence of metaphysics still deserves to be questioned and reflected upon.

Key words: Martin Heidegger; Karl Marx; metaphysics; practice; communism

中图分类号: