东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 99-104.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.01.017

• 语言文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

进化视角介入语用研究的困境阐释

毛延生   

  1. (哈尔滨工程大学外语系,黑龙江哈尔滨150001)
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-12 修回日期:2015-06-12 出版日期:2015-01-25 发布日期:2015-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 毛延生
  • 作者简介:毛延生(1980),男,黑龙江大庆人,哈尔滨工程大学副教授,语言学博士,主要从事语用学理论与应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(12YJC740077,13YJA740078);哈尔滨工程大学研究生精品课资助项目(HEUY131201)。

A Clarification of the Difficultieson Pragmatics Research from an Evolutionary Perspective

MAO Yan-sheng   

  1. (Foreign Languages Department, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)
  • Received:2015-06-12 Revised:2015-06-12 Online:2015-01-25 Published:2015-06-12
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 虽然进化性视角在其他学科研究中得到了前所未有的重视,但在介入到语用研究中时却遇到了诸多困境。当使用具有进化论基础的研究范式解释语言事实时,往往面临着严峻的本体论、认识论和方法论的三层挑战。基于语用研究中的进化性渊源,可以发现:语用研究中进化视角介入所遭遇的误解主要表现为决定论、还原论及盲目乐观论。这些误解的澄清需要语用学界关注进化论的科普教育及语用研究的社会维度,从而实现语用学真正意义上的解放。

关键词: 进化语用学, 决定论, 还原论, 盲目乐观论

Abstract: Evolutionary perspective finds it hard to integrate itself into pragmatics in the form of conundrums though it has been greatly valued in many other disciplinary studies. When an evolutionary paradigm is deployed to explain linguistic facts, it is often confronted with challenges from ontology, epistemology and methodology. Based on the evolutionary veins of pragmatics, it is found that the major misunderstandings of evolutionary perspective on pragmatics are manifested in determinism, reductionism and Panglossianism, the clarification of which requires the academia to focus more on the theories of evolution and the social dimensions of pragmatics so as to emancipate pragmatics in a real sense.

Key words: evolutionary pragmatics, determinism, reductionism, Panglossianism

中图分类号: