东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 401-406.DOI: -

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家变革中正式制度与非正式制度的相互作用以阿根廷20世纪八九十年代的改革为例

谭杨   

  1. (南开大学历史学院,天津300071)
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-27 修回日期:2013-12-27 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 谭杨
  • 作者简介:谭杨(1984-),男,湖南湘潭人,南开大学博士研究生,主要从事拉丁美洲经济史、拉丁美洲政治史、制度经济史研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大资助项目(10JJD770021)。

The Interaction Between Formal Institutions and Informal Institutions in the Process of National ReformA Case Study of Argentine Reform in 1980s and 1990s

TAN Yang   

  1. (School of History, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)
  • Received:2013-12-27 Revised:2013-12-27 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-12-17
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 从制度主义角度看,国家的制度变革涉及到正式制度(规则)的改革和非正式制度(规则)的变迁。然而正式制度的重新设计,受制于决策者主观因素的影响,不可避免地会与非正式制度产生各种不协调甚至冲突。阿根廷20世纪八九十年代的国家变革中,经济自由化政策与传统的“民众主义”非正式规则发生了冲突,政治民主化政策促使传统“地方庇护主义”非正式规则不断强化。这种正式制度与非正式制度的相互作用极大地影响了国家政治经济体系的稳定,并最终引发了国家危机的产生。

关键词: 改革, 正式规则, 非正式规则, 民众主义, 庇护主义

Abstract: From the perspective of institutionalism, national reform is concerned with reforming the formal institutions and changing the informal ones. However, the redesigning of the formal institutions, subjected to the subjective factors of decision makers, will inevitably produce a variety of discordance and even conflict with the informal institutional system. During the Argentine national reform in 1980s and 1990s, the policies of economic liberalization clashed with the informal rules of traditional populism, and the policies of political democratization kept reinforcing the traditional informal rules of “local clientelism”. Such an interaction between the formal system and the informal system greatly affected the stability of the countrys political and economic system, and eventually led to a national crisis.

Key words: reform, formal institution, informal institution, populism, local clientelism

中图分类号: