Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 159-166.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.02.008

• Politics and Public Management • Previous Articles     Next Articles

On the Diversion and Trends of “Accountability” in the Western Public Administrative Reform

HU Chun-yan   

  1. (School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
  • Received:2015-09-06 Revised:2015-09-06 Online:2016-03-25 Published:2016-03-30
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:

    -

Abstract:

In pursuit of good governance, the western public administrative reform has gone through great changes from traditional public administration, new public management to post-new public management, and transformed the relationships among government, markets and civil societies, which has brought about a string of changes of accountability—the traditional public administration put emphasis on “rule and procedure” accountability, the new public management focused on “market-centered” accountability, and the post-new public management was concerned with “multi-centric network” accountability. In different models, the standards, actors and ways of accountability take on varied features.

Key words: traditional public administration, new public management, post-new public management, accountability

CLC Number: