Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 166-174.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.02.009
• Politics and Public Management • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Shuai
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
About author:
Supported by:
-
Abstract:
Contrary to the popular view that Chinas political accountability is accountability without election, this paper attempts to get rid of the election-oriented western thinking and look for a localized interpretation of Chinas political accountability. On this basis, composite accountability was proposed as a competitive concept. It includes both social accountability which functions to provide information mechanisms and administration accountability which functions to implement punishment mechanisms. In China, composite accountability has its institutional basis and behavior patterns, with the former reflecting the multiple principal-agent relationships based on the systems of administrative decentralization and personnel centralization and with the latter reflecting the accountability practices caused by the social resistance since 2003. It has become an effective approach for the Chinese government to resolve social conflicts, respond to social demands, provide public services and reconstruct political order.
Key words: accountability without election, composite accountability, institutional basis, behavior pattern
CLC Number:
D63
YAN Shuai. Institutional Basis and Behavioral Pattern of Chinas Composite Accountability[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2016, 18(2): 166-174.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.02.009
http://xuebao.neu.edu.cn/social/EN/Y2016/V18/I2/166