On the Difficulties of Urban Community Consultation——Based on the In-depth Interview of 35 Community Secretaries

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.02.009

Abstract

Abstract: Community consultation is a vivid practice of mass autonomy at the grassroots level， which is of great significance to resolve social conflicts and promote democracy construction at the grassroots level. Based on an encoding analysis of the in-depth interview data of 35 community secretaries， several major difficulties of city community consultation are explored， including singleness and inadequacy of community consultation subjects， one-sidedness and disorder of community consultation contents， incompleteness and randomness of community consultation procedures， and monism and out datedness of community consultation forms. It is thus proposed to establish the legal policy guarantee of community consultation， improve the subject structure of community consultation， enhance the subject quality of consultation， clarify the content list of community consultation， respond to the common appeals of community residents， better the community consultation procedures， reinforce the use of consultation results， increase the investment of community consultation and innovate the community consultation forms.

Key words: community consultation, code analysis, community resident autonomy

CLC Number:

D035

ZHANG Ping， JIA Chen-yang， ZHAO Jing. On the Difficulties of Urban Community Consultation——Based on the In-depth Interview of 35 Community Secretaries[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2018, 20(2): 170-176.

References

[1]中办、国办印发《关于加强城乡社区协商的意见》［EB/OL］. ［2017-11-25］. http:∥news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2015-07/22/c_1116010168.htm.
[2]顾杰，胡伟. 协商式治理:基层社区治理的可行模式——基于上海浦东华夏社区的经验［J］. 学术界， 2016(8):220-230.
[3]胡宗山. 社区协商民主路线图:义理探诘与行动挑战［J］. 社会科学家， 2016(8):32-38.
[4]闵学勤. 社会实验:嵌入协商治理的可能及可为——以南京市鼓楼区社区协商实验为例［J］. 人文杂志， 2017(3):111-120.
[5]陈荣卓，李梦兰. 政社互动视角下城市社区协商实践创新的差异性和趋势性研究——基于2013—2015年度“中国社区治理十大创新成果”的案例分析［J］. 中共中央党校学报， 2017，21(3):62-73.
[6]李璐. 我国城市社区议事协商机制研究［J］. 中国经贸导刊， 2015(3):61-64.
[7]王立标，首一苇. 推进社区协商制度化建设的问题分析和对策建议［J］. 中国民政， 2015(7):43.
[8]杨贵华. 社区协商的独特价值及其实践推进［J］. 社会科学， 2017(3):75-82.
[9]顾朝曦. 加强城乡社区协商深化基层群众自治——学习习近平总书记关于社会主义协商民主建设的重要论述［J］. 中国民政， 2015(17):11.
[10]冯志峰，廖清城. 协商民主:理论逻辑、功能定位与实施路径［J］. 江西社会科学， 2013(9):175-179.
[11]孙晓娥. 扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析［J］. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)， 2011，31(6):89.
[12]陈伟东，吴恒同. 论城市社区治理的专业化道路［J］. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)， 2015，54(5):21-29.
[13]郑永年. 改革及其敌人［M］. 杭州:浙江人民出版社， 2011:200.

[1]	ZHANG Ping， LIU Wei-min. How Does Public Service Motivation Affect Job Performance: Promotion or Interference?——The Evidence from Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 47-56.
[2]	GUO Yu-chen， DAI Shu-yuan. The Structural Dilemma of Urban Grassroots Community Governance from the Perspective of Policy Network ——An Empirical Research Based on Micro-renewal of Shanghai A Street Office [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 57-65.
[3]	RONG Zhen， BAI Wei-chun. The Internal Logic and Strategic Orientation of Corruption Governance in China from the Perspective of Institutional Change [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 66-72.
[4]	GAO Deng-hui， WEI Shu-yan. An Analysis on the Structural Elements and Action Mechanism of the Ecological Environment Governance of Chinese Provincial Governments Under the Background of Environmental Protection Supervision [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 73-81.
[5]	WANG Fa-shuo， DING Hai-en. How does Official Media Use Affect Confidence in the System?——The Mediating Role of Patriotism and the Moderating Role of Political Knowledge [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(3): 47-55.
[6]	LI Yue， CAO Hai-jun. Data Governance and Its Logic in Government Cross-boundary Collaboration from the Perspective of Data Lifecycle [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(3): 56-63.
[7]	WANG Ying， WANG Meng. A Research on China's Environmental Policy Changes from the Perspective of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory——An Analysis Based on the Policy Text Since the Reform and Opening Up [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(3): 64-72.
[8]	WANG Gang， XU Ya-qian. The Influence Factor of Public Perceived Risk:A Two-dimensional Examination from Interest and Information——Based on the Empirical Analysis of L City [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(1): 73-80.
[9]	LI Yao-yao， PENG Zong-chao. A Research on Innovation of Local Governance from the Perspective of Field Change——A Case Analysis Based on H District Budget Hearing Innovation [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(6): 591-598.
[10]	CHEN Tong， XIA Hong-mei， HOU Guang-hui. Collaboration Platform， Sharing of Control Rights and Provision of Public Digital Cultural Services——Taking Jiaxing City's “Culture With You” as an Example [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(6): 599-606.
[11]	HAN Xiao， WU Jin-peng. Multiple Logics of the Diffusion of Government Information Disclosure System——An Event History Analysis of Chinese Provinces [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(5): 489-496.
[12]	SI Xiao-yue， ZHAO Xia-xia. Knowledge Graph of Domestic Holistic Governance Research ——Bibliometric Analysis of CSSCI and Core Journals Based on CNKI Database in 2008-2018 [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(4): 367-373.
[13]	SUN Zong-feng， ZHAO Wen-bo， LI Jin-tao. The Influence of Contact on Police Performance: The Mediating Effects of Corruption Perception [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(4): 373-380.
[14]	HU Chun-yan， LIU Li-rong. Study on the Differences of Public Officials Accountability in Environmental Pollution Event [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(3): 275-282.
[15]	ZHENG Mei-ling， WEI Shu-yan. Research on the Failure of Policy Transfer in Chinese Government Governance——An Analysis of Policy Transfer Based on “Circuit Breaker” [J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2019, 21(3): 283-290.