Impact Mechanism of Spatial Capital and Social Capital on Public Participation: Based on Chinese Social Survey 2017

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.02.010

Abstract

Abstract: Disorderly participation will reduce efficiency in space production， increase individual inequality and social stratification in the process of rapid urbanization. Aiming to explore the reasons for the decrease of public participation willingness and behaviors， a theoretical framework is constructed with the concept that “spatial capital and social capital can affect public participation through behavioral attitudes”. Based on Chinese Social Survey (CSS) 2017， how “individual and market economic conditions， population density， land resources” at the spatial level and “social trust” at the social level could affect “institutionalized， confrontational， and consultative” participation through individuals' attitudes is systematically examined. It is found that raising land resources retention， increasing individual income， and enhancing social trust can bring institutional participation behaviors. Reduced income and lower social trust can lead to confrontational participation. Consultative participation is positively related to land resources and population density， and negatively related to social trust. Meanwhile， behavioral attitude mediates spatial capital and social capital with public participation.

Key words: public participation; spatial capital; social capital; behavioral attitude

CLC Number:

D638

GUO Yuchen， WU Yue. Impact Mechanism of Spatial Capital and Social Capital on Public Participation: Based on Chinese Social Survey 2017[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2022, 24(2): 81-90.

References

[1]詹姆斯·C.斯科特. 国家的视角: 那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的［M］. 胡晓毅，译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社， 2019.
[2]叶继红. 农民集中居住与移民文化适应: 基于江苏农民集中居住区的调查［M］. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社， 2013.
[3]周丽娟，徐顽强. 居民视角的新型农村社区参与式治理实现策略［J］. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)， 2016(4):86-91.
[4]Burt R S. The Social Capital of Structural Holes［J］. The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field， 2002，148:122.
[5]折晓叶. 县域政府治理模式的新变化［J］. 中国社会科学， 2014(1):121-139.
[6]Rosol M. Public Participation in Post-fordist Urban Green Space Governance: the Case of Community Gardens in Berlin［J］. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research， 2010，34(3):548-563.
[7]陈水生，屈梦蝶. 公民参与城市公共空间治理的价值及其实现路径——来自日本的经验与启示［J］. 中国行政管理， 2020(1):135-141.
[8]黄冬娅. 人们如何卷入公共参与事件基于广州市恩宁路改造中公民行动的分析［J］. 社会， 2013，33(3):131-158.
[9]Wang W，Li H，Cooper T L. Civic Engagement and Citizenship Development: the Case of Homeowners' Participation in Neighborhood Affairs in Beijing［J］. Administration & Society， 2017，49(6):827-851.
[10]庄文嘉. 跨越国家赋予的权利? 对广州市业主抗争的个案研究［J］. 社会， 2011，31(3):88-113.
[11]Stein R，Dillingham G. Political Participation in an Urbanized Society［C］∥Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago: the American Political Science Association， 2004:2-6.
[12]塞缪尔·亨廷顿，乔治·多明格斯. 政治发展［M］∥格林斯坦·波尔斯比. 政治学手册精选: 下卷. 储复耘，译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 1996:150-153.
[13]涂晓芳，汪双凤. 社会资本视域下的社区居民参与研究［J］. 政治学研究， 2008(3):17-21.
[14]潘柄涛. 社会资本与居民社区参与——基于深圳3个村改居社区的实证分析［J］. 学习与实践， 2009，24(6):126-131.
[15]陈捷，卢春龙. 共通性社会资本与特定性社会资本——社会资本与中国的城市基层治理［J］. 社会学研究， 2009，24(6):87-104.
[16]黄荣贵，桂勇. 集体性社会资本对社区参与的影响——基于多层次数据的分析［J］. 社会， 2011，31(6):1-20.
[17]Bahry D，Silver B D. Soviet Citizen Participation on the Eve of Democratization［J］. American Political Science Review， 1990，84(3):821-847.
[18]Leighley J E. Attitudes， Opportunities and Incentives: a Field Essay on Political Participation［J］. Political Research Quarterly， 1995，48(1):181-209.
[19]Arnesen E，Barrows R G，Les Benedict M，et al. The Gilded Age: Perspectives on the Origins of Modern America［M］. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers， 2006.
[20]Kaifeng Y. Public Administrators' Trust in Citizens: a Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts［J］. Public Administration Review， 2005，65(3):273-285.
[21]郭贯成，李金景. 经济欠发达地区农村宅基地流转的地域差异研究——以河北省张家口市为例［J］. 资源科学， 2014，36(6):1229-1234.
[22]陈福平. 强市场中的“弱参与”: 一个公民社会的考察路径［J］. 社会学研究， 2009，24(3):89-111.
[23]Verberg N. Homeownership and Politics: Testing the Political Incorporation Thesis［J］. Canadian Journal of Sociology， 2000，25(2):169-195.
[24]李骏. 住房产权与政治参与: 中国城市的基层社区民主［J］. 社会学研究， 2009，24(5):57-82.
[25]李骏. 移民威胁、经济剥夺还是治理失效——对上海市60个基层社区凝聚力的比较分析［J］. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)， 2018，32(2):23-30.
[26]Rank M R，Hirschl T A. The Link Between Population Density and Welfare Participation［J］. Demography， 1993，30(4): 607-622.
[27]Tavares A F，Carr J B. So Close， Yet So Far Away? the Effects of City Size， Density and Growth on Local Civic Participation［J］. Journal of Urban Affairs， 2013，35(3):283-302.
[28]陈婷婷. 影响核电站公众参与行为的因素分析——基于X核电站的实证研究［J］. 生态经济， 2015，31(1):172-175.
[29]胡荣. 社会资本与城市居民的政治参与［J］. 社会学研究， 2008，23(5):142-159.
[30]钱文荣，应一逍. 农户参与农村公共基础设施供给的意愿及其影响因素分析［J］. 中国农村经济， 2014(11):39-51.［31］刘欣，朱妍. 中国城市的社会阶层与基层人大选举［J］. 社会学研究， 2011，26(6):34-58.［32］William J C. Power and Discontent［J］. American Political Science Review， 1969，63(3):935-936.［33］Hetherington M J. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism［M］. Princeton: Princeton University Press， 2005.［34］陈型颖，王衡. 政治信任、社会网络与抗争倾向: 基于53个国家和地区的实证比较［J］. 社会， 2018，38(1):186-214.