基于政策执行的基层政府社会稳定风险评估一项面向西部Z县的质性研究

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2013.06.010

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 606-612.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2013.06.010

基于政策执行的基层政府社会稳定风险评估一项面向西部Z县的质性研究

刘泽照^1,2，王惠佳³，黄杰¹

(1.西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院，陕西西安710049;2.西安交通大学管理学院，陕西西安710049;3.西北政法大学刑事法学院，陕西西安710112)

发布日期:2015-11-10
通讯作者: 刘泽照
作者简介:刘泽照(1981-)，男，江苏徐州人，西安交通大学博士研究生，主要从事政府风险管理、系统科学研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(13CZZ032)。

Social Stability Risk Assessment for Grassroots Government in the Perspective of Policy ImplementationA Qualitative Case Study of Western Z County

LIU Ze-zhao^1,2， WANG Hui-jia³， HUANG Jie¹

(1. School of Public Policy and Administration， Xian Jiaotong University， Xian 710049， China; 2. School of Management， Xian Jiaotong University， Xian 710049， China; 3. School of Criminal Law， Northwest University of Political Science & Law， Xian 710112， China)

Published:2015-11-10
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 社会稳定风险评估的实施路径日益引起我国基层地方政府官员的关注，越来越成为现实工作推进中的突出问题之一。引入政策执行的分析视角，以我国西部Z县为调查样本，应用质性扎根理论对影响基层县级政府社会稳定风险评估机制的关键因素进行了探索性识别。研究显示:内隐意识、执行成本、行政系统规范、制度工具情境这四个主范畴对以县级政府为代表的基层社会稳定风险评估执行存在显著影响。在此基础上进一步提炼推进我国基层政府社会稳定风险评估制度实施的针对性思路，对当前一线实践具有典型的启示价值。

关键词: 社会稳定风险评估, 政策执行, 扎根理论, 基层政府

Abstract: The implementation path of social stability risk assessment has brought about more concerns to Chinese local officials， and increasingly become one of the prominent problems in practical work. By adopting the grounded theory， this paper introduces the theoretical perspectives of policy implementation， gathers data from Z County through in-depth interviews， and undertakes an explorative identification research of the influential factors of social stability risk assessment for grassroots government. The study indicates that the four main categories that exert significant effects on social stability risk assessment at the grass-roots county level are implicit awareness， implementation costs， administrative specifications and system tools. On this basis， some constructive viewpoints are further proposed to scientifically promote social stability risk assessment for grass-roots government， as is of practical significance.

Key words: social stability risk assessment, policy implementation, grounded theory, grassroots government

中图分类号:

刘泽照，王惠佳，黄杰. 基于政策执行的基层政府社会稳定风险评估一项面向西部Z县的质性研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 15(6): 606-612.

LIU Ze-zhao， WANG Hui-jia， HUANG Jie. Social Stability Risk Assessment for Grassroots Government in the Perspective of Policy ImplementationA Qualitative Case Study of Western Z County[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2013, 15(6): 606-612.

参考文献

[1]Van Meter D S， Van Horn C E. The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework［J］. Administration and Society， 1975，6(4):445-468.
[2]Mazmunian D A， Sabatier P A. Implementation and Public Policy: With a New Postscript ［M］. Chicago: Scott Foresman Company， 1983.
[3]Lipsky M. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service［M］. New York: Russell Sage Foundation， 1980.
[4]Berman P. The Study of Macro and Micro Implementation of Social Policy［J］. Public Policy， 1978，26(2):157-184.
[5]Elmore R. Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions［J］. Political Science Quarterly， 1979，94(4):601-616.
[6]Hjern B. Implementation Research: The Link Gone Missing［J］. Journal of Public Policy， 1982，2(3):301-308.
[7]Sabatier P A. Top-down and Bottom-up Approach to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis［J］. Journal of Public Policy， 1986，6(1):21-48.
[8]Matland R E. Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-conflict Model of Policy Implementation［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 1995，5(2):145-174.
[9]Goggin M L， Bowman A O. Studying the Dynamics of Public Policy Implementation: A Third-generation Approach［M］∥Palumbo D J， Calista D J. Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box. Westport: Greenwood Press， 1990.
[10]Rhodes R A W， Marsh D. New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks［J］. European Journal of Political Research， 1992，21(2):181-205.
[11]Andrew G. How Networks Explain Unintended Policy Implementation Outcomes: The Case of UK Rail Privatization［J］. Public Administration， 2001，79(4):851-870.
[12]Corbin J， Strauss A. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures， Canons， and Evaluative Criteria［J］. Qualitative Sociology， 1990，13(1):3-21.
[13]Spillane J P， Reiser B J. Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research［J］. Review of Educational Research， 2002，72(3):387-431.
[14]Guagnano G A. Influences on Attitude-behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling［J］. Environment and Behavior， 1995，27(5):699-718.

基于政策执行的基层政府社会稳定风险评估一项面向西部Z县的质性研究

Social Stability Risk Assessment for Grassroots Government in the Perspective of Policy ImplementationA Qualitative Case Study of Western Z County

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王颖，王梦. 容错机制运行受阻的影响维度与管制路径——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 39-47.
[2]	郭振中，刘冠男. 基于扎根理论的“街社交互关系”研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(2): 177-183.
[3]	李金龙，武俊伟. 社会建构理论视域下我国基层政府政策执行的难题及其求解[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(5): 491-497.
[4]	于兆吉，张嘉桐. 基于扎根理论的突发性网络舆情演化影响因素研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(5): 498-503.
[5]	杨大瀚，魏淑艳. 中国政府监管失效的因素模型构建研究基于扎根理论的分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 18(4): 381-387.
[6]	王辉，崔欣欣. 农村低保政策执行中的“合谋”行为研究以鲁中C镇为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(6): 606-612.
[7]	于立深，刘东霞. 论社会稳定风险评估制度的行政自制功能[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(4): 404-409.