东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 159-166.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.02.008

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论西方公共行政改革背景下“问责”的转向与趋势

胡春艳   

  1. (中南大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410083)
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-06 修回日期:2015-09-06 出版日期:2016-03-25 发布日期:2016-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 胡春艳
  • 作者简介:胡春艳(1977-),女,湖南郴州人,中南大学副教授,管理学博士,主要从事政府管理改革与问责制研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71303262);“十二五”湖南省重点学科资助项目(湘教发[2011]76号)。

On the Diversion and Trends of “Accountability” in the Western Public Administrative Reform

HU Chun-yan   

  1. (School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
  • Received:2015-09-06 Revised:2015-09-06 Online:2016-03-25 Published:2016-03-30
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:

    -

摘要:

为了追求“良好的”政府治理目标,西方公共行政经历了传统公共行政、新公共管理和后新公共管理的变迁,这些改革深刻地改变了政府与市场、公民社会之间的相互关系,“问责”随之发生了一系列变化:较早的传统公共行政侧重“规则和程序”的问责,新公共管理注重以“市场”为中心的问责,后新公共管理则注重“多中心网络”的问责。在不同的问责模式下,问责的标准、问责的行动者、问责的方式出现了不同的特征。

关键词: 传统公共行政, 新公共管理, 后新公共管理, 问责

Abstract:

In pursuit of good governance, the western public administrative reform has gone through great changes from traditional public administration, new public management to post-new public management, and transformed the relationships among government, markets and civil societies, which has brought about a string of changes of accountability—the traditional public administration put emphasis on “rule and procedure” accountability, the new public management focused on “market-centered” accountability, and the post-new public management was concerned with “multi-centric network” accountability. In different models, the standards, actors and ways of accountability take on varied features.

Key words: traditional public administration, new public management, post-new public management, accountability

中图分类号: