东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 275-282.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.03.008

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境污染事件中官员问责的结果差异研究

胡春艳,刘丽蓉   

  1. (中南大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410083)
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-29 修回日期:2018-10-29 出版日期:2019-05-25 发布日期:2019-05-24
  • 通讯作者: 胡春艳
  • 作者简介:胡春艳(1977-),女,湖南郴州人,中南大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事问责制研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71873147)。

Study on the Differences of Public Officials Accountability in Environmental Pollution Event

HU Chun-yan, LIU Li-rong   

  1. (School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
  • Received:2018-10-29 Revised:2018-10-29 Online:2019-05-25 Published:2019-05-24
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 基于2007—2017年发生的22个环境污染事件中203名官员的问责结果,从问责主体、问责客体、问责事由三个维度出发,用Ordinal有序回归分析了影响官员问责严厉程度的主要因素。研究发现,官员的责任类型是决定官员问责结果的关键因素,职位等级、介入的政府层级和环境污染事件严重程度对官员问责结果影响显著,舆论压力与问责结果有一定相关性但对问责结果的影响却并不显著。分析表明,我国环境污染事件官员问责的实施总体上比较规范,但是依然存在一些问题,如环境问责法律法规中责任类型界定不明晰、对高层官员的问责力度过小、地方政府环境问责力度欠缺等。因此应进一步加强官员问责制度建设,加强中央政府对地方政府问责的指导和监督,并使社会问责制度化,从而推进我国环境问责向法治化、常态化转变。

关键词: 环境污染事件, 官员问责, 问责结果, 社会问责

Abstract: Based on the accountability results of 203 public officials who were held accountable in 22 environmental pollution events during 2007-2017, this paper analyzes the main factors that affect the severity of officials accountability from the three dimensions of accountability subject, accountability object and accountability reasons by using Ordinal logistic regression method. The research shows that official liability type is the key factor in determining the official accountability; the rank of position, the involvement of the government rank, and the severity of environmental pollution event have a significant impact on the accountability of officials; the pressure of public opinion is related to the results of accountability but its impact is not significant. The analysis shows that the implementation of accountability of officials of environmental pollution events in China is in general relatively more standardized, but there are still some problems, such as the unclear definition of different types of liability in environmental accountability laws and regulations, weak accountability to the high-level officials, and the lack of local government environmental accountability, etc. Therefore, it is important to further strengthen the officials accountability system, enhance the guidance and supervision of the central government on the accountability of local governments, and institutionalize social accountability to promote the transformation of China's environmental accountability into a rule of law and normalization.

Key words: environmental pollution event, public officials accountability, accountability result, social accountability

中图分类号: