东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 43-50.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.01.007

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

县级监察委治理基层“微腐败”:实践价值、现实问题与应对策略

吕永祥，王立峰   

  1. (吉林大学行政学院，吉林长春130012)
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-22 修回日期:2018-05-22 出版日期:2019-01-25 发布日期:2019-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 吕永祥
  • 作者简介:吕永祥(1988-)，男， 安徽亳州人，吉林大学博士研究生，主要从事国家监察体制改革和腐败治理研究;王立峰(1976-)，男，辽宁鞍山人，吉林大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事国家监察体制改革和廉政理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关资助项目(17JZD003);国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BFX017);吉林大学廉政智库建设资助项目(2017LZZKY006)。

County-level Supervisory Committees Controlling Grassroots“Micro-corruption”: Practical Value， Realistic Problems and Coping Strategies

LYU Yong-xiang， WANG Li-feng   

  1. (School of Administration， Jilin University， Changchun 130012， China)
  • Received:2018-05-22 Revised:2018-05-22 Online:2019-01-25 Published:2019-01-12
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

1087

摘要： 基层“微腐败”是一种重要的腐败类型，健全县级监察委治理基层“微腐败”的体制机制对提升基层民众在腐败治理中的获得感和培育清正廉洁的基层政治生态具有重要价值。目前县级监察委在治理基层“微腐败”时通常存在着“微腐败”案件多发易发与基层监察力量“三个不增加”之间的矛盾比较突出、监察人员容易受到基层人情关系的干扰和基层公职人员与黑恶势力相互勾结增加“微腐败”治理的难度等现实问题。鉴于此，县级监察委在健全治理基层“微腐败”的体制机制时需要从以下三个方面入手:通过加强监察人员培训与内设机构整合提升县级监察委的腐败治理效能，综合运用异地交叉巡察和报请提级管辖等手段排除基层人情因素的干扰，将基层“微腐败”治理与扫黑除恶专项治理结合起来。

关键词: 县级监察委, 基层“微腐败”, 人情干扰, 异地交叉巡察, 扫黑除恶

Abstract: Grassroots “micro-corruption” is an important type of corruption. It is of great value for county-level supervisory committees to perfect the governance mechanism for controlling grassroots “micro-corruption”， to enhance grassroots people's sense of gains， and to foster a clean and honest grassroots political ecology. At present， county-level supervisory committees usually have the following problems when they conduct grassroots “micro-corruption” governance: the contradiction between the frequent occurrences of “micro-corruption” cases at the grassroots levels and the “three non-increase” of the supervisory force at county-level supervisory committees， the easy interference of personal Guanxi， and the increase of difficulties in “micro-corruption” governance as a result of collusion between grassroots officials and evil forces. In view of this， county-level supervisory committees need to start from the following three aspects when perfecting the governance mechanism for control of grassroots “micro-corruption”: enhancing corruption governance efficiency of county supervision committees by strengthening the inspectors training and the integration of internal organizations; taking comprehensive measures such as cross-examination and level-up jurisdiction to eliminate interference from basic human factors; combining “micro-corruption” governance at the grassroots levels with the special efforts of cracking down on evil forces.

Key words: county-level supervisory committee, grassroots “micro-corruption”, interpersonal interference, off-site cross-inspection, cracking down on evil forces

中图分类号: