互联网场域边缘企业合法性获取及其制度创业过程研究——以滴滴出行为例

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.06.005

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 31-41.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.06.005

互联网场域边缘企业合法性获取及其制度创业过程研究——以滴滴出行为例

林晨雨，符正平，刘晓运

(中山大学管理学院，广东广州510275)

收稿日期:2020-04-28 修回日期:2020-04-28 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-22
通讯作者: 林晨雨
作者简介:林晨雨(1994-)，男，广西柳州人，中山大学博士研究生，主要从事合法性理论和创新创业研究;符正平(1965-)，男，湖南益阳人，中山大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事产业经济及战略管理研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金专项课题资助项目(18VSJ075);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372141)。

A Study on the Legitimacy Obtainment and Process of Institutional Entrepreneurship of Marginal Enterprises in Internet Field——A Case Study of Didi Chuxing

LIN Chen-yu， FU Zheng-ping， LIU Xiao-yun

(School of Business， Sun Yat-Sen University， Guangzhou 510275， China)

Received:2020-04-28 Revised:2020-04-28 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-22
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 既有的制度创业研究主要关注场域中心企业的创业过程，对边缘企业如何获取合法性并推动制度创业的过程尚缺乏深入剖析。以滴滴出行为例，探讨边缘企业合法性获取并推动制度创业的内在逻辑。案例分析结果发现:“互联网+”背景下，边缘企业的制度创业经历了“去制度化与前制度化-半制度化-理论化”的发展阶段，其场域位置经历了从边缘到中心移动的过程，合法性要求呈现“规范-认知-规制”的动态演变。在制度创业过程中，边缘企业采取依从环境、选择环境和操纵环境的途径获取与建构合法性并促进新的场域逐步建立，最终推动制度创业的完成。

关键词: 组织场域, 合法性, 制度创业, 滴滴出行

Abstract: The existing research on institutional entrepreneurship focuses on the entrepreneurial process of center enterprises in the field， but it lacks in-depth analysis on how marginal enterprises obtain legitimacy and promote the process of institutional entrepreneurship. This paper takes Didi Chuxing as an example and discusses the internal logic of obtaining the legitimacy to promote institutional entrepreneurship of marginal enterprises. The results of the case study show that the institutional entrepreneurship of marginal enterprises under the background of Internet goes through the development stages of “de-institutionalization， pre-institutionalization， semi-institutionalization and theorization”， and the field position of marginal enterprises moves from the edge to the center. The legality requirement presents the dynamic evolution of “norm-cognition-regulation”. In the process of institutional entrepreneurship， new fields are gradually established， and marginal enterprises obtain and construct legitimacy by following the environment， choosing the environment and manipulating the environment to finally promote the completion of institutional entrepreneurship.

Key words: organizational field, legitimacy, institutional entrepreneurship, Didi Chuxing

中图分类号:

C936

林晨雨，符正平，刘晓运. 互联网场域边缘企业合法性获取及其制度创业过程研究——以滴滴出行为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(6): 31-41.

LIN Chen-yu， FU Zheng-ping， LIU Xiao-yun. A Study on the Legitimacy Obtainment and Process of Institutional Entrepreneurship of Marginal Enterprises in Internet Field——A Case Study of Didi Chuxing[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(6): 31-41.

参考文献

[1]Smets M，Morris T，Greenwood R. From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-driven Institutional Change［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2012，55(4):877-904.
[2]王志玮，叶凌峰，吴清，等. 转型经济下破坏性技术创业及其合法性演化研究——MX公司纵向案例分析［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理， 2018，39(8):100-114.
[3]Su J，Zhai Q，Karlsson T. Beyond Red Tape and Fools: Institutional Theory in Entrepreneurship Research， 1992-2014［J］. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice， 2016，41(4):505-531.
[4]Greenwood R，Suddaby R. Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2006，49(1):27-48.
[5]Seo M，Creed W E. Institutional Contradictions， Praxis， and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective［J］. Academy of Management Review， 2002，27(2):222-247.
[6]Hoffman A J. Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 1999，42(4):351-371.
[7]Dimaggio P，Powell W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields［J］. American Sociological Review， 1983，45(2):147-160.
[8]苏郁锋，吴能全，周翔. 企业协同演化视角的组织场域制度化研究——以互联网金融为例［J］. 南开管理评论， 2015，18(5):122-135.
[9]Maguire S，Hardy C，Lawrence T. Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2004，47(5):657-679.
[10]Tolbert P，Zucker L. The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory［M］∥Clegg S，Hardy C，Nord W. Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage， 1996:175-190.
[11]Zilber T. Stories and the Discursive Dynamics of Institutional Entrepreneurship: The Case of Israeli High-tech After the Bubble［J］. Organization Studies， 2007，28(7):1035-1054.
[12]Battilana J. Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals' Social Position［J］. Organization， 2006，13(5):653-676.
[13]Rojas F. Power Through Institutional Work: Acquiring Academic Authority in the 1968 Third World Strike［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2010，53(6):1263-1280.
[14]Garud R，Jain S，Kumaraswamy A. Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Sponsorship of Common Technological Standards: The Case of Sun Microsystems and Java［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2002，45(1):196-214.
[15]Qureshi I，Kistruck G M，Bhatt B. The Enabling and Constraining Effects of Social Ties in the Process of Institutional Entrepreneurship［J］. Organization Studies， 2016，37(3):425-447.
[16]Maguire S，Hardy C. Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The Decline of DDT［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2009，52(1):148-178.
[17]Greenwood R，Suddaby R，Hinings C R A. Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2002，45(1):58-80.
[18]Suchman M C. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches［J］. Academy of Management Review， 1995，20(3):571-610.
[19]Kibler E，Kautonen T，Fink M. Regional Social Legitimacy of Entrepreneurship: Implications for Entrepreneurial Intention and Start-up Behaviour［J］. Regional Studies， 2014，48(6):995-1015.
[20]Scott W R. Institutions and Organizations. Ideas， Interests and Identities［M］.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication， 1995:59-73.
[21]曾楚宏，朱仁宏，李孔岳. 基于战略视角的组织合法性研究［J］.外国经济与管理， 2008，30(2):9-15.
[22]Wright A，Zammuto R. Creating Opportunities for Institutional Entrepreneurship: The Colonel and the Cup in English County Cricket［J］. Journal of Business Venturing， 2013，28(1):51-68.
[23]Lee C K，Hung S C. Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy: China's Shan-Zhai Mobile Phones［J］. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal， 2014，8(1):16-36.
[24]蔡宁，贺锦江，王节祥. “互联网+”背景下的制度压力与企业创业战略选择——基于滴滴出行平台的案例研究［J］. 中国工业经济， 2017(3):174-192.
[25]贺锦江，王节祥，蔡宁. 场域转变视角下互联网平台企业的制度创业研究［J］. 科学学研究， 2019，37(12):2288-2297.
[26]罗伯特·殷. 案例分析: 设计与方法［M］. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社， 2004:50-60.
[27]朱丽，柳卸林，宋继文. 网络范式下的管理学研究及前沿热点［J］. 管理世界， 2016(10):184-185.
[28]尹珏林，任兵. 组织场域的衰落、重现与制度创业: 基于中国直销行业的案例研究［J］. 管理世界， 2009(S1):13-26.
[29]魏江，赵齐禹. 规制合法性溢出和企业政治战略——基于华为公司的案例研究［J］. 科学学研究， 2019，37(4):651-663.
[30]何轩，马骏. 党建也是生产力——民营企业党组织建设的机制与效果研究［J］. 社会学研究， 2018，33(3):1-24.

互联网场域边缘企业合法性获取及其制度创业过程研究——以滴滴出行为例

A Study on the Legitimacy Obtainment and Process of Institutional Entrepreneurship of Marginal Enterprises in Internet Field——A Case Study of Didi Chuxing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	武静，周俊. 合法性视角下社会组织“进社区”的耦合策略分析——以上海市L机构为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 20(3): 284-290.
[2]	佟德元;. 东北政务委员会合法性探究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2011, 13(1): 64-67.