悖论式领导与员工越轨创新关系研究——心理安全感与领导能力可信性的作用

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.05.004

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 23-30.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.05.004

悖论式领导与员工越轨创新关系研究——心理安全感与领导能力可信性的作用

陈慧，杨宁

(北京邮电大学经济管理学院，北京100876)

发布日期:2021-10-14
通讯作者: 陈慧
作者简介:陈慧(1970-)，女，山西侯马人，北京邮电大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事组织行为与人力资源管理研究;杨宁(1993-)，男，陕西榆林人，北京邮电大学博士研究生，主要从事组织行为与管理心理学研究。
基金资助:
北京邮电大学教育教学改革资助项目(2019TD04)。

Research on the Relationship Between Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Bootleg Innovation: The Role of Psychological Safety and Leader Ability Trustworthiness

CHEN Hui， YANG Ning

(School of Economics and Management， Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications， Beijing 100876， China)

Published:2021-10-14
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 员工越轨创新是一种具有高风险与高回报的矛盾型创新行为。基于社会信息加工理论，通过对206份员工数据的分析，研究了悖论式领导对员工越轨创新的影响，并探讨了心理安全感与领导能力可信性的作用。研究结果表明:悖论式领导正向影响员工越轨创新;心理安全感在悖论式领导与员工越轨创新的关系中具有部分中介作用;领导能力可信性正向调节心理安全感在悖论式领导与员工越轨创新之间的中介作用，即领导能力可信性越高，心理安全感的中介作用越强。

关键词: 越轨创新; 悖论式领导; 心理安全感; 领导能力可信性; 社会信息加工理论

Abstract: Bootleg innovation is an innovation activity that individuals privately engage in， which has the contradictory characteristics of high risk and high reward. Based on social information processing theory， this paper studies the effect of paradoxical leadership on employee bootleg innovation and explores the role of psychological safety and leader ability trustworthiness. The data are collected from 206 employees at multiple points in time. The results show that paradoxical leadership is positively related to employee bootleg innovation and this relationship is partially mediated by psychological safety. Leader ability trustworthiness positively regulates the mediating role of psychological safety between paradoxical leadership and employee bootleg innovation， that is， the higher the leader ability trustworthiness， the stronger the mediating role of psychological safety. The conclusions enrich researches on employee bootleg innovation and paradoxical leadership.

Key words: bootleg innovation; paradoxical leadership; psychological safety; leader ability trustworthiness; social information processing theory

中图分类号:

F272.9

陈慧，杨宁. 悖论式领导与员工越轨创新关系研究——心理安全感与领导能力可信性的作用[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(5): 23-30.

CHEN Hui， YANG Ning. Research on the Relationship Between Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Bootleg Innovation: The Role of Psychological Safety and Leader Ability Trustworthiness[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2021, 23(5): 23-30.

参考文献

[1]Criscuolo P，Salter A，Ter Wal A L J. Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance［J］. Organization Science， 2014，25(5):1287-1305.
[2]Burgelman R A. A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm［J］. Administrative Science Quarterly， 1983，28(2):223-244.
[3]王弘钰，于佳利. 组织创新氛围对越轨创新行为的影响机制研究［J］. 软科学， 2019，33(2):126-129.
[4]赵乐，乐嘉昂，王雷. 领导调节聚焦行为对越轨创新的影响——创新资源结构性紧张和创造力的联合调节作用［J］. 预测， 2019，38(1):1-7.
[5]杨剑钊，李晓娣. 前摄型人格对越轨创新绩效作用路径研究——创新催化的中介作用及变革型领导行为的调节作用［J］. 预测， 2019，38(4):17-23.
[6]Rego A，Owens B，Leal S，et al. How Leader Humility Helps Teams to Be Humbler， Psychologically Stronger， and More Effective: a Moderated Mediation Model［J］. The Leadership Quarterly， 2017，28(5):639-658.
[7]Zhang Y，Waldman D A，Han Y，et al. Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2015，58(2):538-566.
[8]Salancik G R，Pfeffer J. A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design［J］. Administrative Science Quarterly， 1978，23(2):224-253.
[9]May D R，Gilson R L，Harter L M. The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness， Safety and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work［J］. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology， 2004，77(1):11-37.
[10]Xu M，Qin X，Dust S B，et al. Supervisor-subordinate Proactive Personality Congruence and Psychological Safety: a Signaling Theory Approach to Employee Voice Behavior［J］. The Leadership Quarterly， 2019，30(4):440-453.
[11]Dirks K T，Ferrin D L. Trust in Leadership: Meta-analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2002，87(4):611-628.
[12]Shazi R，Gillespie N，Steen J. Trust as a Predictor of Innovation Network Ties in Project Teams［J］. International Journal of Project Management， 2015，33(1):81-91.
[13]辛迅. 社会学习理论视角下领导——下属之间的工作重塑传递效应研究［J］. 中国人力资源开发， 2017(3):18-27.
[14]Edmondson A. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams［J］. Administrative Science Quarterly， 1999，44(2):350-383.
[15]Liang J，Farh C I C，Farh J. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: a Two-wave Examination［J］. Academy of Management Journal， 2012，55(1):71-92.
[16]Wang Y F，Liu J Q，Zhu Y. Humble Leadership， Psychological Safety， Knowledge Sharing， and Follower Creativity: a Cross-level Investigation［J］. Frontiers in Psychology， 2018，9(9):17-27.
[17]Nielsen M B，Eid J，Mearns K，et al. Authentic Leadership and Its Relationship with Risk Perception and Safety Climate［J］. Leadership & Organization Development Journal， 2013，34(4):308-325.
[18]Kessel M，Kratzer J，Schultz C. Psychological Safety， Knowledge Sharing， and Creative Performance in Healthcare Teams［J］. Creativity and Innovation Management， 2012，21(2):147-157.
[19]Frazier M L，Fainshmidt S，Klinger R L，et al. Psychological Safety: a Meta-analytic Review and Extension［J］. Personnel Psychology， 2017，70(1):113-165.
[20]Burke C S，Sims D E，Lazzara E H，et al. Trust in Leadership: a Multi-level Review and Integration［J］. The Leadership Quarterly， 2007，18(6):606-632.
[21]Brislin R W. Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research［J］. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology， 1970，1(3):185-216.
[22]Mayer R C，Davis J H. The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: a Field Quasi-experiment［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology， 1999，84(1):123-136.
[23]Becker T E，Atinc G，Breaugh J A，et al. Statistical Control in Correlational Studies: 10 Essential Recommendations for Organizational Researchers［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior， 2016，37(2):157-167.

悖论式领导与员工越轨创新关系研究——心理安全感与领导能力可信性的作用

Research on the Relationship Between Paradoxical Leadership and Employee Bootleg Innovation: The Role of Psychological Safety and Leader Ability Trustworthiness

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晶，张昱城，王丽君. 家庭支持型主管行为与员工睡眠质量的关系——工作家庭增益、压力知觉的中介作用[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(2): 50-57.
[2]	乔坤，杨晨露. 资质过剩感对主动职业生涯行为的U型影响[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 23(1): 34-42.