东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 1-6.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.001

• 科技哲学研究 •    下一篇

口罩的技术现象学分析

田凯今   

  1. (中国科学院大学人文学院，北京100049)
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-07 修回日期:2021-09-07 接受日期:2021-09-07 发布日期:2022-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 田凯今
  • 作者简介:田凯今(1995-)，男，辽宁铁岭人，中国科学院大学博士研究生，主要从事技术与工程哲学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    -

Analysis of Mask Based on Technological Phenomenology

TIAN Kaijin   

  1. (School of Humanities， University of Chinese Academy of Sciences， Beijing 100049， China)
  • Received:2021-09-07 Revised:2021-09-07 Accepted:2021-09-07 Published:2022-11-26
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

471

摘要： 以技术现象学方法对口罩进行分析，揭示口罩特有的信任困难，解释“抗拒戴口罩”现象。现有的技术现象学理论在解释口罩案例上有一定的局限性，伊德理论中存在着对“具身”概念的误用。“放大/缩小结构”与“透明性”概念也存在局限，相较“透明性”，“安全性”在口罩案例中更为重要。考察口罩在不同情境中的多重稳定性，说明文化等情境因素通过诠释学策略与关系策略的传递进入知觉。作为一项具体技术的哲学研究，口罩的技术现象学分析可以丰富对口罩的认识，并对伊德理论作出若干修正与补充。

关键词: 口罩; 技术现象学; 具身关系; 透明性; 诠释学关系

Abstract: The article analyzes masks with technological phenomenology， reveals the difficulty of the mask-specific trust， and explains the “anti-wearing mask” phenomenon. The existing technological phenomenological theories have certain limitations in explaining mask cases， and there is a misuse of “embodied” concepts in Ihde's theory. “Magnification/reduction” and “transparency” concepts also have limitations. Compared with “transparency”， “security” is more important in mask cases. By examining the multistability of masks in different contexts， it is found that cultural and other contextual factors enter perception through the transmission of hermeneutic strategies and relationship strategies. As a philosophical research of specific technologies， the article can enrich the understanding of masks， and provide several revisions and supplements to Ihde's theory.

Key words: mask;technological phenomenology; embodiment relation; transparency; hermeneutic relation

中图分类号: