东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 84-93.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.06.011

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

组织、领导传销活动罪之罪量计算

陈俊良   

  1. (北京大学法学院,北京100871)
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-27 修回日期:2021-09-27 接受日期:2021-09-27 发布日期:2022-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 陈俊良
  • 作者简介:陈俊良(1995-),男,四川广安人,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事刑法教义学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(18ZDA149)。

The Calculation of the Amount of Crime of Organizing and Leading Pyramid Schemes

CHEN Junliang   

  1. (Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Received:2021-09-27 Revised:2021-09-27 Accepted:2021-09-27 Published:2022-11-26
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 组织、领导传销活动罪在司法裁判中存在普遍的罪刑失衡,因为以司法解释为根据的主流观点为发展下线人数设置了间接发展的计算规则,致使罪量被严重高估。以全国规模的“善心汇”传销组织为典型案例,对1792份裁判文书中的数据建立多元线性回归模型可知,现有罪量计算规则无法合理描述罪刑之间的均衡关系。所谓间接发展规则在刑法教义学上存在滥用体系解释技巧、忽视共犯作用耗损以及过度导入刑事政策三个维度的具体缺陷,将之一一修正之后,应对初犯的积极参与者转而适用直接发展规则。

关键词: 组织、领导传销活动罪; 罪量; 罪刑均衡; 间接发展规则

Abstract: There is obvious imbalance between crime and punishment in the practice of the crime of organizing and leading pyramid schemes, because the number of participants recruited by the defendant is calculated by indirect rules based on the mainstream view of judicial interpretation, which leads the amount of crime to a serious overestimation. Taking the national-scale “ShanXinHui” Organization as a typical case, a multiple linear regression model established on the data in 1792 judgment documents shows that the existing crime calculation rules cannot reasonably describe the balanced relationship between crime and punishment. Indirect calculating rules have three specific defects in criminal law dogmatics, namely, abuse of system interpretation skills, neglect of accomplices' depletion, and excessive import of criminal policies. After these defects are amended, it is advisable to apply direct calculating rules to first-time offenders.

Key words: crime of organizing and leading pyramid schemes; amount of crime; the balance of the crime and punishment; indirect calculating rule

中图分类号: