东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 105-112.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.06.012

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式人工智能海量复制文本的侵权认定规则之重构

武振国   

  1. (北京科技大学文法学院,北京100083)
  • 发布日期:2024-12-06
  • 通讯作者: 武振国
  • 作者简介:武振国(1995-),男,河南南阳人,北京科技大学讲师,法学博士,主要从事知识产权法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研资助项目(22SFB5015)。

Reconstruction of Infringement Determination Rules for Massive Copying of Texts by Generative Artificial Intelligence

WU Zhenguo   

  1. (School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)
  • Published:2024-12-06
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 生成式人工智能的训练过程需要复制海量文本,该行为是否构成版权侵权关系着生成式人工智能开发的合法性。在作者中心主义的视角下,作品是作者人格或者劳动的外延且完全受作者控制,生成式人工智能私自复制作品将损害作者的排他性权利,故传统版权侵权认定规则的要件仅为“接触+实质性相似”。从市场中心主义的角度,作者的版权存在市场边界,不包括作品主要交易市场之外的市场失灵领域。因此,版权侵权认定规则需要进行重构,在“接触+实质性相似”的基础上增加“市场损害”这一要件,重点考虑作品使用行为对作品主要交易市场的影响。数字场景下,生成式人工智能海量复制文本的行为只要没有进入作者版权的市场边界,也就无法对作品造成市场损害并构成侵权行为。

关键词: 生成式人工智能;数字时代;版权侵权;复制行为;传播行为

Abstract: The legality of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) development hinges on whether the act of copying vast amounts of texts during its training process constitutes copyright infringement. From the author-centered perspective, a work is seen as an extension of the author's personality or labor, entirely under the author's control. Unauthorized copying of a work by GAI infringes on the author's exclusive rights. Consequently, the traditional copyright infringement criteria have been based solely on “access + substantial similarity”. However, from the market-centered perspective, the author's copyright has market boundaries that do not extend to the areas of market failure beyond the primary market for the work. Therefore, the criteria for determining copyright infringement should be reconstructed, adding the element of “market harm” to the traditional “access + substantial similarity” framework. The focus should be on the impact of the work's use on its primary market. In the digital context, if GAI's massive copying of texts does not enter the market boundaries of the author's copyright, it cannot cause market harm and thus does not constitute infringement.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence (GAI); digital age; copyright infringement; copying behavior; dissemination behavior

中图分类号: