东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 113-122.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.06.013

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

连带责任保证之诉的判决效力——基于诉讼要件理论的实证考察

张弛   

  1. (北京大学法学院,北京100871)
  • 发布日期:2024-12-06
  • 通讯作者: 张弛
  • 作者简介:张弛(1996-),女,山东济南人,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事民事诉讼法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金资助项目(20BFX085)。

Judgment Effectiveness of Joint and Several Liability Guarantee Action: Empirical Study Based on the Theory of Litigation Elements

ZHANG Chi   

  1. (Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Published:2024-12-06
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 诉讼要件理论从当事人、诉讼标的和法院管辖的角度确定了连带责任保证的诉讼形态,决定了判决效力的主观与客观范围。在诉讼标的层面,连带责任保证债务具有连带性、阶层性和相对独立性。在当事人层面,可通过扩张解释将其归为普通共同诉讼,由此产生一并起诉型、单独起诉型、第三人参加型等诉讼形态。在法院管辖层面,依据保证之诉的不同形态分别确定管辖法院。一并起诉型中,追偿权判项不具有消极既判力和执行力,保证人追偿时需另行提起追偿之诉;单独起诉型中,前诉判决不应对作为案外人的主债务人产生既判力,预决效也弱化为证明效;第三人参加型中,在保障主债务人程序权利的同时,兼顾诉讼经济与事实查明的需要,方可确认其参加效的约束力。

关键词: 连带责任保证;诉讼要件;追偿权;既判力;诉讼标的

Abstract: The theory of litigation elements determines the litigation form of joint and several liability guarantee from the perspectives of the parties, the ligation subject matter and the court jurisdiction, and determines the subjective and objective scope of judgment effectiveness. At the level of litigation subject matter, joint and several liability guarantees that debt has joint and several nature, hierarchical nature and relative independence. At the party level, it can be classified as an ordinary joint action through expanded interpretation, resulting in litigation forms of “joint action”, “separate action”, and “third-party participation”. At the level of court jurisdiction, it is determined by the different forms of guarantee litigation. The judgment on recovery right in a joint action guarantee litigation does not have negative res judicata or enforcement power, and the guarantor needs to file a separate lawsuit for recovery when pursuing compensation. In the separate action, the judgment of previous lawsuits should not have res judicata effect on the principal debtor as a non-party, and the preclusive effect is weakened to the evidentiary effect. In the third-party participation, the binding force of its participation effect can only be recognized while safeguarding the procedural rights of the principal debtor and taking into account the needs of litigation economy and fact-finding.

Key words: joint and several liability guarantee; litigation element; recovery right; res judicata; litigation object

中图分类号: