人工智能道德增强方案的哲学省思

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.04.004

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 21-28.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.04.004

人工智能道德增强方案的哲学省思

周境林¹，周腾²

(1.复旦大学哲学学院，上海200433;2.海南大学网络空间安全学院，海南海口570208)

发布日期:2024-09-03
通讯作者: 周境林
作者简介:周境林(1993-)，男，广东汕头人，复旦大学博士后研究人员，主要从事人工智能伦理学、道德认知论研究;周腾(1987-)，男，广东澄海人，海南大学教授，工学博士，主要从事人工智能研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(20&ZD045);国家资助博士后研究人员计划资助项目(GZC20230549);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2024M750562);海南省高等学校教育教学改革研究重点资助项目(Hnjg2024ZD-16)。

Philosophical Reflection on AI-Based Moral Enhancement Approaches

ZHOU Jinglin¹， ZHOU Teng²

(1. School of Philosophy， Fudan University， Shanghai 220433， China; 2. School of Cyberspace Security， Hainan University， Haikou 570208， China)

Published:2024-09-03
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了防范人类生存危机，道德增强进入了科技伦理议程中。由于生物医学道德增强的诸多弊端，各种人工智能道德增强方案被陆续提出，分别为:人工智能作为人类道德决策的“替代者”“建议者”或“对话者”;“替代者方案”将导致道德消亡，阻碍道德进步，但适用于危急情境;“建议者方案”会损害能动者的能动性，固化其道德观念，但适用于日常决策;“对话者方案”能够帮助用户实现道德成长，但无法提供道德动力。混合式道德增强将各方案应用于不同场景，在紧急状态下调用“替代者”模式，在日常生活道德决策情境中唤醒“建议者”模式，在空闲时段进入“对话者”模式，兼顾三种方案优点又规避其缺陷。但混合式方案仍需要生物道德增强的辅助以提升用户道德动机，并被纳为义务性培训的一部分。

关键词: 道德进步; 道德增强; 人工智能; 生存危机; 生物医学增强

Abstract: To guard against crises threatening human existence， moral enhancement has entered the agenda of technological ethics. In response to the numerous drawbacks of biomedical moral enhancement， various AI-based moral enhancement approaches have been proposed， which can be categorized as AI serving as a “substitute”， “advisor”， or “interlocutor” in human moral decision-making. The “substitute” approach may lead to the demise of morality and hinder moral progress， but it is suitable for emergencies. The “advisor” approach might diminish human agency and rigidify their moral conceptions， yet it is appropriate for everyday decisions. The “interlocutor” approach might help users achieve moral growth but fails to provide moral motivation. A hybrid moral enhancement approach applies these strategies to different scenarios， invoking the “substitute” mode in emergencies， activating the “advisor” mode in daily moral decision-making contexts， and entering the “interlocutor” mode during the idle time. This hybrid approach capitalizes on the advantages of each approach while avoiding their shortcomings. However， the hybrid approach still requires the support of biomedical moral enhancement to boost users' moral motivation and should be integrated into compulsory educational programs.

Key words: moral progress; moral enhancement; artificial intelligence; existential crisis; biomedical enhancement

中图分类号:

B82-057

周境林，周腾. 人工智能道德增强方案的哲学省思[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 26(4): 21-28.

ZHOU Jinglin， ZHOU Teng. Philosophical Reflection on AI-Based Moral Enhancement Approaches[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2024, 26(4): 21-28.

参考文献

[1]Persson I，Savulescu J. Unfit for the future: the need for moral enhancement［M］. New York: Oxford University Press， 2012.
[2]Douglas T. Moral enhancement［J］. Journal of Applied Philosophy， 2008，25(3):228-245.
[3]Persson I，Savulescu J. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity［J］. Journal of Applied Philosophy， 2008，25(3):162-177.
[4]Savulescu J，Maslen H. Moral enhancement and artificial intelligence: moral AI?［M］∥Romportl J，Zackova E，Kelemen J. Beyond Artificial Intelligence: The Disappearing Human-Machine Divide. Cham: Springer， 2015.
[5]Savulescu J，Persson I. Moral enhancement， freedom， and the god machine［J］. Monist， 2012，95(3):399-421.
[6]Harris J. Moral enhancement and freedom［J］. Bioethics， 2011，25(2):102-111.
[7]Lara F，Deckers J. Artificial intelligence as a Socratic assistant for moral enhancement［J］. Neuroethics， 2020，13(3):275-287.
[8]Gips J. Towards the ethical robot［M］∥Anderson M，Anderson S L. Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2011:244-253.
[9]Dietrich E. Homo sapiens 2.0: why we should build the better robots of our nature［J］. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence， 2001，13(4):323-328.
[10]Schaefer G O. Direct vs. indirect moral enhancement［J］. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal， 2015，25(3):261-289.
[11]Focquaert F，Schermer M. Moral enhancement: do means matter morally?［J］. Neuroethics， 2015，8(2):139-151.
[12]Mill J S. On liberty［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2011:13.
[13]Sinnott-Armstrong W，Skoburg J A. How AI can aid bioethics［J］. Journal of Practical Ethics， 2021，9(1):278-280
[14]Vallor S. Moral deskilling and upskilling in a new machine age: reflections on the ambiguous future of character［J］. Philosophy & Technology， 2015，28(1):107-124.
[15]Aristotle. Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press， 2014:183-204.
[16]Van Wynsberghe A，Robbins S. Critiquing the reasons for making artificial moral agents［J］. Science and Engineering Ethics， 2019，25(3):719-735.
[17]Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty［M］∥Hardy H. Liberty. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press， 2002:166-217.
[18]Giubilini A，Savulescu J. The artificial moral advisor: the “ideal observer” meets artificial intelligence［J］. Philosophy & Technology， 2018，31(2):169-188.
[19]Lara F. Why a virtual assistant for moral enhancement when we could have a Socrates?［J/OL］. Science and Engineering Ethics， 2021，27(4):42［2023-09-06］. https:∥link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-021-00318-5.
[20]Talbot P J，Ellis D R. Applications of artificial intelligence for decision-making: multi-strategy reasoning under uncertainty［M］. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform， 2015:1-100.
[21]Tweedale J W，Neves-Silva R，Jain L C，et al. Intelligent decision technology support in practice［M］. Cham: Springer， 2016:1-150.
[22]Phillips-Wren G，Ichalkaranje N，Jain L C. Intelligent decision making: an AI-based approach［M］. Berlin: Springer， 2008:1-200.
[23]O'Neil E，Klincewicz M，Kemmer M. Ethical issues with artificial ethics assistants［M］∥ Véliz C. The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press， 2021.
[24]Volkman R，Gabriels K. AI moral enhancement: upgrading the socio-technical system of moral engagement［J/OL］. Science and Engineering Ethics， 2023，29(2):11［2023-09-06］. https:∥link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-023-00428-2.

人工智能道德增强方案的哲学省思

Philosophical Reflection on AI-Based Moral Enhancement Approaches

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李小燕. 老人护理机器人伦理风险探析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 17(6): 561-566.
[2]	赛子豪. 道家哲学视域下的元宇宙思考:辩护、理念与准则[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 25(4): 1-8.