东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 1-8.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2023.04.001

• 科技哲学研究 •    下一篇

道家哲学视域下的元宇宙思考:辩护、理念与准则

赛子豪   

  1. (东南大学人文学院,江苏南京211189)
  • 发布日期:2023-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 赛子豪
  • 作者简介:赛子豪(1993-),男,河南漯河人,东南大学博士研究生,主要从事道家哲学、技术哲学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    -

Metaverse Thinking in the Perspective of Taoism: Defense, Idea and Guidelines

SAI Zihao   

  1. (School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
  • Published:2023-08-15
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 本体论的虚假和价值论的虚无是元宇宙面临的两个本质性批评。道家哲学可以为元宇宙提供辩护、理念与准则。道家哲学认为元宇宙并不混淆真假,全身沉浸的元宇宙生活并不必然滑向精神虚无,元宇宙不存在所谓“原罪”。道家哲学自由幸福的精神之“游”可以为元宇宙提供理念引领:“鼓腹而游”坚持对现实宇宙利益的顺应与观照;“逍遥之游”保持对现实存在方式的距离与超越。道家哲学“无为”范畴下的“不敢”“不仁”“不宰”“不争”可以为元宇宙提供实践准则,规避元宇宙技术可能带来的安全、公平、自由、环境方面的风险。

关键词: 元宇宙; 道家哲学; 游; 无为

Abstract: Metaverse is facing essence criticisms about falsehood in ontology and nihility in axiology. Taoism can provide defense,idea and guidelines for metaverse. In taoism, metaverse does not confuse true and false, metaverse living in the full-body immersion form is also not necessarily slide into nihility. There is no “original sins” so-called for metaverse. “Play” of free and happy in taoism can provide idea for metaverse, “satiety then play” insists on the conformity and concerns to the realistic benefits. “Leisurely play” keeps distance and transcendence from the realistic universe. “Bugan”“Buren”“Buzai”“Buzheng”, which are included in “Wuwei” in taoism, can provide practical guidelines for metaverse to avoid security, equity, freedom, and environment risks that may be brought about by metaverse technology.

Key words: metaverse; Taoism; play; Wuwei

中图分类号: