东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 637-643.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2019.06.012

• 马克思主义理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

德国“新马克思阅读”运动的商品拜物教新释——兼评西方马克思主义的两种解读路径

梁燕晓   

  1. (清华大学人文学院,北京100084)
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-08 修回日期:2019-03-08 出版日期:2019-11-25 发布日期:2019-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 梁燕晓
  • 作者简介:梁燕晓(1990-),男,山东平阴人,清华大学博士研究生,主要从事马克思哲学基础理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家留学基金资助项目(201806210408)。

A New Interpretation of Commodity Fetishism in German “Neue Marx-Lektüre”——Comment on the Two Interpretation Paths of Western Marxism

LIANG Yan-xiao   

  1. (School of Humanities, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
  • Received:2019-03-08 Revised:2019-03-08 Online:2019-11-25 Published:2019-11-26
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 在西方马克思主义的诸流派中,存在着两种解读商品拜物教的路径:非价值形式路径与价值形式路径。卢卡奇的物化理论是前一种路径的代表,其特点在于脱离《资本论》的具体文本语境,借用外部理论资源进行诠释,并寄希望于主观主义色彩的方式打破物化结构,这极大地影响了西方马克思主义关于拜物教问题的研究走向;后一种路径的代表是德国“新马克思阅读”运动的先驱巴克豪斯所提出的价值形式辩证法,它重视《资本论》不同版本中关于价值形式的“双重叙述”问题,从等价形式必须“以使用价值表现价值”的特点中解释商品拜物教的形成机制,并立足于生产方式的变革来突破这一物化结构。后一种路径对于如何消弥当前“MEGA研究”和“法兰克福学派研究”的二分化趋势亦有着借鉴意义。

关键词: 商品拜物教, 价值形式, 卢卡奇, 巴克豪斯, 《资本论》版本

Abstract: Among many schools of Western Marxism, there are two paths to interpret the commodity fetishism: the non-value-form path and the value-form path. Lukács's materialization theory is representative of the former path. It is characterized by being away from the specific textual context of Capital, interpreting it from external theoretical resources, and hoping that subjectivism breaks through the materialized structure, which greatly influences the research trend of Western Marxism; the latter path is represented by the dialectic of value form proposed by Backhaus of German “Neue Marx-Lektüre”, which attaches importance to the “double narrative” of value forms in different versions of Capital, and explains the formation mechanism of commodity fetishism from the characteristics of the equivalent form expressing value through use value, and resorts to the transformation of production method to break through this materialized structure. The latter path is also useful for how to eliminate the current trend of divergence between “MEGA Research” and “Frankfurt School Research”.

Key words: commodity fetishism, value-form, Lukács, Backhaus, version of Capital

中图分类号: