东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 81-89.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.04.010

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

秩序法益对合同诈骗罪的限定功能

张晓媛   

  1. (北京大学法学院,北京100871)
  • 修回日期:2021-03-04 接受日期:2021-03-04 发布日期:2022-08-29
  • 通讯作者: 张晓媛
  • 作者简介:张晓媛(1993-),女,江苏沭阳人,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事刑法教义学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学基金资助项目(L19BFX001)。

The Limited Function of Order Law Interest to Crime of Contract Fraud

ZHANG Xiaoyuan   

  1. (Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Revised:2021-03-04 Accepted:2021-03-04 Published:2022-08-29
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 秩序法益在合同诈骗罪中是一个不容忽视的客观存在,其在与普通诈骗罪的界分中具有独立的功能性地位。经济合同和人身专属性合同的区分,以及商主体和自然人个体的区分,虽然能够为两罪的界分以及“两头骗”案件的定性提供一定的标准,但这只是在经验层面对秩序法益外延的类型归纳,无法排除反证情况的存在。从“让交易主体按照自己意愿从事销售、购买等活动”的市场本质出发,秩序法益的核心内涵应是“市场主体对市场交易活动的自主参与自由”;在具体适用合同诈骗罪的时候,应将“被害人的财产处分自由以及对市场交易活动的自主参与自由”具体融入到构成要件的判断中,发挥秩序法益的限定功能,避免“对合同要求仅流于形式”的做法。

关键词: 秩序法益; 合同诈骗; 交易主体; 自主参与自由

Abstract: The order law interest is an objective existence which cannot be ignored in the crime of contract fraud and has the independent function of distinguishing ordinary crime of fraud. Although the distinction between economic contract and personal exclusive contract, as well as the distinction between business subject and individual natural person, can provide a certain standard for the division of two crimes and the qualitative determination of “double-fraud” cases, it is only the induction of the type of extension of order law interest at the experience level, and cannot exclude counterproof existence. Starting from the market essence of “letting market subjects freely participate in market trading activities”, the core connotation of order law interest should be “the freedom of independent participation of market subjects in market trading activities”. In the specific application of the crime of contract fraud, “the victim's freedom of property disposal and the freedom of independent participation in market trading activities” should be specifically integrated into the judgment of constitutive elements, so as to give play to the limited function of the order law interest and avoid the practice of “contract requirements only becoming a mere formality”.

Key words: order law interest; contract fraud; trading entity; freedom of independent participation

中图分类号: