东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 202-207.DOI: -

• 马克思主义理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

现代性视域下的道德困境探究从“耶路撒冷的艾希曼”谈起

刘洋   

  1. (华东师范大学马克思主义与当代发展研究中心,上海200241)
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-16 修回日期:2013-10-16 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 刘洋
  • 作者简介:刘洋(1988-),男,安徽南陵人,华东师范大学博士研究生,主要从事马克思主义与当代发展问题研究。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市哲学社会科学规划基金资助项目(2012BKS001)。

On the Moral Dilemma from the Perspective of ModernityStarting from Eichmann of Jerusalem

LIU Yang   

  1. (Marxism and Contemporary Development Research Center, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
  • Received:2013-10-16 Revised:2013-10-16 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-04-17
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 现代性蕴含着社会结构层面的现代性和文化心理层面的现代性两重维度,现代性的道德困境也在这两重维度展开。社会结构层面的现代性对理性主义的强调导致了“道德中立”和“道德无涉”现象的产生,文化心理层面的现代性对感官原则的强调致使“道德情感主义”和“价值个体主义”的出现。理性道德论和德性伦理学分别从理性和德性对现代性道德困境加以分析,但两者都只抓住了真理的一个方面。“规范—德性—德行”的现代性道德体系的建构是对二者的调和与超越,它强调理性道德规范内化为个体德性,再由个体德性外化为个体在社会生活中的德行。

关键词: 现代性, 道德困境, 道德体系

Abstract: Modernity is represented by the dual dimensions at the levels of social structure and cultural psychology, and the moral dilemma of modernity is unfolded in the two dimensions. The modernity at the social structure level emphasizes rationalism, leading to moral neutrality and moral freedom, and the modernity at the cultural psychology level stresses sensory principles, resulting in moral emotionalism and value individualism. Rational ethics and virtue ethics interpret the moral dilemma of modernity from reason and moral respectively, but both only cling to one aspect of the truth. The construction of modern moral system of normmoralvirtue is a coordination and transcendence of the two, which emphasizes rational moral norms internalizing individual morality and individual morality externalizing individual behaviors in the social life.

Key words: modernity, moral dilemma, moral system

中图分类号: