东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 511-517.DOI: -

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层公共文化基础设施政策绩效及其制度因素探究以浙江省农家书屋为例

李金珊，徐越   

  1. (浙江大学公共管理学院，浙江杭州310058)
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-25 修回日期:2014-02-25 出版日期:2014-09-25 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 李金珊
  • 作者简介:李金珊(1962-)，女，浙江温州人，浙江大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事公共经济和公共政策研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(71273198);教育部博士研究生学术新人奖资助项目(5052012115001)。

Reforms of Civil Service Pension Systems in Representative Countries and Their ImplicationsA Comparative Analysis of UK， USA and Japan

YIN Bao-ming   

  1. (Center for Social Security Studies， Wuhan University， Wuhan 430072， China)
  • Received:2014-02-25 Revised:2014-02-25 Online:2014-09-25 Published:2015-11-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

524

摘要： 从制度分析的角度解释基层公共文化基础设施政策绩效呈现差异的原因，并从效率、公平、效果和可持续性四个维度对政策绩效进行了界定。以基层公共文化基础设施的典型代表浙江省农家书屋为例进行政策绩效评价，从制度分析的角度对农家书屋政策绩效评价结果加以分析，提炼出功能复合程度、可替代品的易获得程度、后续资金保障、专职管理、更新维护机制、群众需求的强弱和上级主管单位重视程度等七项对我国基层公共文化基础设施的政策绩效具有解释力的制度因素，并用24个行政村的数据对上述制度因素进行了验证。

关键词: 公共文化, 基础设施, 政策绩效, 制度框架

Abstract: The UK， USA and Japan are the representative models of state welfare style， self-supporting with social aid style and East Asian welfare style respectively. Under the principle of striking a balance between equity and efficiency， the three countries have developed their civil service pension systems from initial separate ones into multi-layer ones by merging with the other systems， which consist of public basic pension， occupational pension and complementary pension. Despite the differences in funding models， funding resources， contribution rates， payment-related criterias and replacement levels， they have all achieved a collaborative share of financial responsibility between the government and the individuals， thus relieving the pressure of fiscal sustainability and meeting the differentiated old-age supporting demands.

Key words: pension system reform, civil servant, international comparison

中图分类号: