东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 436-440.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2016.04.018

• 语言学研究 • 上一篇    

互文性与模因论的差异分析

于洋欢1,2   

  1. (1.清华大学人文学院，北京100084;2.加州大学伯克利分校文理学院，美国伯克利94720)
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-20 修回日期:2016-01-20 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 于洋欢
  • 作者简介:于洋欢(1986-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，清华大学博士研究生，主要从事翻译与跨文化、比较文学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(12YJC740137);江苏省社会科学基金资助项目(13WWC011);北京市社会科学基金资助项目(14WYB015)。

On the Differences Between Intertextuality and Memetics

YU Yang-huan1,2   

  1. (1. School of Humanities， Tsinghua University， Beijing 100084， China; 2. College of Letters and Science， University of California at Berkeley， Berkeley 94720， USA)
  • Received:2016-01-20 Revised:2016-01-20 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-25
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

1119

摘要： 互文性理论颠覆了长久以来文本自给自足的观点，为文本分析提供了全新的视角;模因论阐释了语言和文化在复制、传递和进化过程中出现的诸多相似的现象，为探讨语言和文化的传承及演化拓宽了视野。互文性理论与模因论有一定的相似之处。然而，这两种理论有着本质的差异:在理论来源及内涵上，互文性源自后结构主义，而模因论基于生物进化论;在主要分析单位上，互文性的主要分析单位是文本，而模因论是语言;在指向性上，互文性指向未来，而模因论指向过去;在理论体系上，互文性的理论体系严谨成熟，而模因论处于发展完善的阶段。

关键词: 互文性, 模因论, 后结构主义, 指向性

Abstract: The theory of intertextuality has changed the long-standing view of texts as self-sufficient entities and created a new paradigm for textual analysis ever since it was proposed. Meanwhile， memetics puts much emphasis on the elaboration of similar phenomena in the process of replication， transmission and evolution of languages and cultures， which would widen the horizon for research on the inheritance and evolution of languages and cultures. Although similarities could be found between intertextuality and memetics， there exist quintessential differences between these two theories. From the aspect of theoretical origin and connotation， intertextuality originated from post-structuralism whereas memetics originated from the theory of biological evolution; from the aspect of major analyzing units， intertextuality focuses on texts whereas memetics emphasizes languages; from the aspect of directionality， intertextuality directs at the future whereas memetics directs at the past; and from the aspect of theoretical system， intertextuality is a developed theory whereas memetics is still a developing one.

Key words: intertextuality, memetics, post-structuralism, directionality

中图分类号: