东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 291-298.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2018.03.011

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论逮捕双层次证明模式

王雷   

  1. (辽宁大学法学院，辽宁沈阳110031)
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-05 修回日期:2017-12-05 出版日期:2018-05-25 发布日期:2018-05-28
  • 通讯作者: 王雷
  • 作者简介:王雷(1977-)，男，辽宁沈阳人，辽宁大学博士研究生，辽宁省人民检察院高级检察官，主要从事刑事诉讼法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BZZ042);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71704156)。

Research on Two-level Arrest Proof Mode

WANG Lei   

  1. (Law School， Liaoning University， Shenyang 110031， China)
  • Received:2017-12-05 Revised:2017-12-05 Online:2018-05-25 Published:2018-05-28
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

716

摘要： 我国逮捕制度在实体要件方面存在着逻辑关系错误的问题，在审查程序方面存在着行政色彩过浓、司法属性较弱的弊端，二者共同造就了“构罪即捕”的实践难题。为了解决这些问题，需要对我国现行的逮捕法律规范进行理论透视和要素重构，并对检察机关的审查程序进行诉讼化转型，构建起以提请逮捕的犯罪事实和嫌疑人社会危险性为证明对象，并适用不同证明标准、证明方法、证明程序的逮捕双层次证明模式，能防错捕，又防滥押，使我国批捕制度更加符合刑事司法规律，提高逮捕决定的准确性和权威性。

关键词: 逮捕证明, 证明模式, 双层次证明, 社会危险性

Abstract: The existence of wrong logical relations in entity element of the arrest system in our country and the problem of strong administrative color and weak judicial nature in the review process have brought practical difficultiesin“arresting if constituting a crime”. In order to solve these problems， it is necessary to carry out a theoretical perspective， restructure factors of current norms concerning arrest laws in our country， proceed with the litigation transformation of the review procedures of procuratorial organs， and establish a two-level proof mode which can prove that the suspects have committed crimes and are dangerous to the society. Such mode should be applicable to different proof standards， methods， and certification procedures so as to prevent wrong arrest and illegal detention， making the arrest system in China more in line with the laws of criminal justice and thus improving the accuracy and authority of arrest decisions.

Key words: arrest proof, proof mode, two-level proof, social danger

中图分类号: