东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 111-119.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.03.014

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

司法人工智能的可能空间、内在限度与前景展望

王文玉   

  1. (重庆大学法学院,重庆400044)
  • 修回日期:2020-11-15 接受日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2022-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 王文玉
  • 作者简介:王文玉(1992-),男,河南商丘人,重庆大学博士研究生,主要从事法律方法论、人工智能法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大研究专项资助项目(18VHJ009);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2021CDSKXYFX009)。

The Possible Space, Inherent Limit and Prospect of Judicial Artificial Intelligence

WANG Wenyu   

  1. (Law School, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)
  • Revised:2020-11-15 Accepted:2020-11-15 Published:2022-06-03
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 与人类法官相比,司法人工智能在高效性、客观中立性、稳定性、可预测性以及保障同案同判目标的实现方面更具优势。司法人工智能的应用面临着一系列的技术困境、价值挑战和法治难题,这就决定了司法人工智能并不能全面取代法官展开司法裁判。将简单案件和事务性工作交由司法人工智能处理,将疑难、复杂案件仍交由人类法官审理裁决则是一种更加积极和务实的人机共处方案。在此基础之上,还应当努力优化案例筛选、价值嵌入、算法公开和监督制度,加强对当事人诉讼权利的保障,推进复合型人才的培养,建构合理的责任分配机制,以保障司法人工智能的高效性、安全性和可靠性。

关键词: 司法人工智能; 人机共处模式; 司法裁判; 人工智能算法

Abstract: Compared with human judges, judicial artificial intelligence has more advantages in terms of efficiency, objective neutrality, stability, predictability, and guaranteeing simultaneous judgments in similar cases. However, the application of judicial artificial intelligence still faces a series of technical difficulties, value challenges and legal problems, which determines that judicial artificial intelligence cannot completely replace human judges. It is a more active and pragmatic human-machine coexistence model to hand simple cases and routine work to judicial artificial intelligence, and difficult and complex cases to human judges. In addition, we should strive to optimize case selection, value embedding, algorithm disclosure and supervision system, strengthen the protection of litigant rights, promote the cultivation of compound talents, and construct a reasonable responsibility distribution system to ensure the efficiency, safety and reliability of judicial artificial intelligence.

Key words: judicial artificial intelligence; human-computer coexistence model; judicial decision; artificial intelligence algorithm

中图分类号: